# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

May  2009, 3(2): 259-274. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2009.3.259

## A time-domain probe method for three-dimensional rough surface reconstructions

 1 Department of Mathematics, University of Reading, Whiteknights, PO Box 220, Berkshire, RG6 6AX, United Kingdom, United Kingdom

Received  November 2008 Revised  March 2009 Published  May 2009

The task of this paper is to develop a Time-Domain Probe Method for the reconstruction of impenetrable scatterers. The basic idea of the method is to use pulses in the time domain and the time-dependent response of the scatterer to reconstruct its location and shape. The method is based on the basic causality principle of time-dependent scattering. The method is independent of the boundary condition and is applicable for limited aperture scattering data.
In particular, we discuss the reconstruction of the shape of a rough surface in three dimensions from time-domain measurements of the scattered field. In practise, measurement data is collected where the incident field is given by a pulse. We formulate the time-domain field reconstruction problem equivalently via frequency-domain integral equations or via a retarded boundary integral equation based on results of Bamberger, Ha-Duong, Lubich. In contrast to pure frequency domain methods here we use a time-domain characterization of the unknown shape for its reconstruction.
Our paper will describe the Time-Domain Probe Method and relate it to previous frequency-domain approaches on sampling and probe methods by Colton, Kirsch, Ikehata, Potthast, Luke, Sylvester et al. The approach significantly extends recent work of Chandler-Wilde and Lines (2005) and Luke and Potthast (2006) on the time-domain point source method. We provide a complete convergence analysis for the method for the rough surface scattering case and provide numerical simulations and examples.
Citation: Corinna Burkard, Roland Potthast. A time-domain probe method for three-dimensional rough surface reconstructions. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2009, 3 (2) : 259-274. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2009.3.259
 [1] Jan Sokołowski, Jan Stebel. Shape optimization for non-Newtonian fluids in time-dependent domains. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2014, 3 (2) : 331-348. doi: 10.3934/eect.2014.3.331 [2] Bernard Ducomet. Asymptotics for 1D flows with time-dependent external fields. Conference Publications, 2007, 2007 (Special) : 323-333. doi: 10.3934/proc.2007.2007.323 [3] Mourad Choulli, Yavar Kian. Stability of the determination of a time-dependent coefficient in parabolic equations. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2013, 3 (2) : 143-160. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2013.3.143 [4] Feng Zhou, Chunyou Sun, Xin Li. Dynamics for the damped wave equations on time-dependent domains. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2018, 23 (4) : 1645-1674. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018068 [5] Stephen Anco, Maria Rosa, Maria Luz Gandarias. Conservation laws and symmetries of time-dependent generalized KdV equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2018, 11 (4) : 607-615. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2018035 [6] Fengjuan Meng, Meihua Yang, Chengkui Zhong. Attractors for wave equations with nonlinear damping on time-dependent space. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (1) : 205-225. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016.21.205 [7] Tingting Liu, Qiaozhen Ma. Time-dependent asymptotic behavior of the solution for plate equations with linear memory. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2018, 23 (10) : 4595-4616. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018178 [8] Matti Viikinkoski, Mikko Kaasalainen. Shape reconstruction from images: Pixel fields and Fourier transform. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2014, 8 (3) : 885-900. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2014.8.885 [9] Alexander Zlotnik, Ilya Zlotnik. Finite element method with discrete transparent boundary conditions for the time-dependent 1D Schrödinger equation. Kinetic & Related Models, 2012, 5 (3) : 639-667. doi: 10.3934/krm.2012.5.639 [10] Mikko Kaasalainen. Multimodal inverse problems: Maximum compatibility estimate and shape reconstruction. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2011, 5 (1) : 37-57. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2011.5.37 [11] Toshiyuki Suzuki. Scattering theory for semilinear Schrödinger equations with an inverse-square potential via energy methods. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2019, 8 (2) : 447-471. doi: 10.3934/eect.2019022 [12] Masaru Ikehata. The enclosure method for inverse obstacle scattering using a single electromagnetic wave in time domain. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2016, 10 (1) : 131-163. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2016.10.131 [13] Takeshi Fukao, Masahiro Kubo. Time-dependent obstacle problem in thermohydraulics. Conference Publications, 2009, 2009 (Special) : 240-249. doi: 10.3934/proc.2009.2009.240 [14] Giuseppe Maria Coclite, Mauro Garavello, Laura V. Spinolo. Optimal strategies for a time-dependent harvesting problem. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2018, 11 (5) : 865-900. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2018053 [15] Francesco Di Plinio, Gregory S. Duane, Roger Temam. Time-dependent attractor for the Oscillon equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2011, 29 (1) : 141-167. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.29.141 [16] G. Dal Maso, Antonio DeSimone, M. G. Mora, M. Morini. Time-dependent systems of generalized Young measures. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2007, 2 (1) : 1-36. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2007.2.1 [17] Jin Takahashi, Eiji Yanagida. Time-dependent singularities in the heat equation. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2015, 14 (3) : 969-979. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2015.14.969 [18] Mohammed Al Horani, Angelo Favini, Hiroki Tanabe. Inverse problems for evolution equations with time dependent operator-coefficients. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2016, 9 (3) : 737-744. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2016025 [19] Roman Chapko. On a Hybrid method for shape reconstruction of a buried object in an elastostatic half plane. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2009, 3 (2) : 199-210. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2009.3.199 [20] Daniel Guo, John Drake. A global semi-Lagrangian spectral model of shallow water equations with time-dependent variable resolution. Conference Publications, 2005, 2005 (Special) : 355-364. doi: 10.3934/proc.2005.2005.355

2018 Impact Factor: 1.469