# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

2013, 3(1): 31-48. doi: 10.3934/naco.2013.3.31

## Safe and reliable coverage control

 1 Coordinated Science Laboratory, Department of Industrial and Enterprise Systems Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, United States 2 Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States 3 Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States

Received  December 2011 Revised  November 2012 Published  January 2013

In this paper we consider a problem of designing control laws for multiple mobile agents trying to accomplish three objectives. One of the objectives is to sense a given compact domain while satisfying the other objective which is to avoid collisions between the agents themselves as well as with the obstacles. To keep the communication links between the agents reliable, the agents need to stay relatively close during the sensing operation which is the third and final objective. The design of control laws is based on carefully constructed objective functions and on an assumption that the agents' dynamic models are nonlinear yet affine in control laws. As an illustration of some performance characteristics of the proposed control laws, a numerical example is provided.
Citation: Dušan M. Stipanović, Christopher Valicka, Claire J. Tomlin, Thomas R. Bewley. Safe and reliable coverage control. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2013, 3 (1) : 31-48. doi: 10.3934/naco.2013.3.31
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
 [1] Heinz Schättler, Urszula Ledzewicz, Helmut Maurer. Sufficient conditions for strong local optimality in optimal control problems with $L_{2}$-type objectives and control constraints. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2014, 19 (8) : 2657-2679. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2014.19.2657 [2] Zhaohua Gong, Chongyang Liu, Yujing Wang. Optimal control of switched systems with multiple time-delays and a cost on changing control. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2018, 14 (1) : 183-198. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017042 [3] Piernicola Bettiol, Hélène Frankowska. Lipschitz regularity of solution map of control systems with multiple state constraints. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2012, 32 (1) : 1-26. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2012.32.1 [4] Laurenz Göllmann, Helmut Maurer. Theory and applications of optimal control problems with multiple time-delays. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2014, 10 (2) : 413-441. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2014.10.413 [5] Jinggui Gao, Xiaoyan Zhao, Jinggang Zhai. Optimal control of microbial fed-batch culture involving multiple feeds. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2015, 5 (4) : 339-349. doi: 10.3934/naco.2015.5.339 [6] Qun Lin, Ryan Loxton, Kok Lay Teo. The control parameterization method for nonlinear optimal control: A survey. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2014, 10 (1) : 275-309. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2014.10.275 [7] Alain Bensoussan, John Liu, Jiguang Yuan. Singular control and impulse control: A common approach. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2010, 13 (1) : 27-57. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.13.27 [8] Cristiana J. Silva, Helmut Maurer, Delfim F. M. Torres. Optimal control of a Tuberculosis model with state and control delays. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2017, 14 (1) : 321-337. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2017021 [9] Victor Ayala, Adriano Da Silva, Luiz A. B. San Martin. Control systems on flag manifolds and their chain control sets. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2017, 37 (5) : 2301-2313. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017101 [10] Ling Yun Wang, Wei Hua Gui, Kok Lay Teo, Ryan Loxton, Chun Hua Yang. Time delayed optimal control problems with multiple characteristic time points: Computation and industrial applications. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2009, 5 (4) : 705-718. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2009.5.705 [11] Yuan Zhao, Wuyi Yue. Performance evaluation and optimization of cognitive radio networks with adjustable access control for multiple secondary users. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2019, 15 (1) : 1-14. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018029 [12] Chongyang Liu, Meijia Han. Time-delay optimal control of a fed-batch production involving multiple feeds. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2018, 0 (0) : 0-0. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020099 [13] Yves Dumont, Frederic Chiroleu. Vector control for the Chikungunya disease. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2010, 7 (2) : 313-345. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2010.7.313 [14] Andrew D. Lewis. Linearisation of tautological control systems. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2016, 8 (1) : 99-138. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2016.8.99 [15] Thalya Burden, Jon Ernstberger, K. Renee Fister. Optimal control applied to immunotherapy. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2004, 4 (1) : 135-146. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2004.4.135 [16] Yuri B. Gaididei, Carlos Gorria, Rainer Berkemer, Peter L. Christiansen, Atsushi Kawamoto, Mads P. Sørensen, Jens Starke. Stochastic control of traffic patterns. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2013, 8 (1) : 261-273. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2013.8.261 [17] Ellina Grigorieva, Evgenii Khailov. Optimal control of pollution stock. Conference Publications, 2011, 2011 (Special) : 578-588. doi: 10.3934/proc.2011.2011.578 [18] Julijana Gjorgjieva, Kelly Smith, Gerardo Chowell, Fabio Sánchez, Jessica Snyder, Carlos Castillo-Chavez. The Role of Vaccination in the Control of SARS. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2005, 2 (4) : 753-769. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2005.2.753 [19] Sandra Ricardo, Witold Respondek. When is a control system mechanical?. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2010, 2 (3) : 265-302. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2010.2.265 [20] Tyrone E. Duncan. Some topics in stochastic control. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2010, 14 (4) : 1361-1373. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.14.1361

Impact Factor: