# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

September  2018, 8(3&4): 1021-1049. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2018044

## Forward backward SDEs in weak formulation

 1 School of Mathematics and Statistics, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China 2 Department of Mathematics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA

* Corresponding author: J. Zhang

Received  December 2017 Revised  February 2018 Published  September 2018

Fund Project: Wang is supported by Distinguished Middle-Aged and Young Scientist Encourage and Reward Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2017BA033); Zhang is supported by NSF grant #1413717, and Zhang would like to thank Daniel Lacker for very helpful discussion on Section 2.3.2

Although having been developed for more than two decades, the theory of forward backward stochastic differential equations is still far from complete. In this paper, we take one step back and investigate the formulation of FBSDEs. Motivated from several considerations, both in theory and in applications, we propose to study FBSDEs in weak formulation, rather than the strong formulation in the standard literature. That is, the backward SDE is driven by the forward component, instead of by the Brownian motion. We establish the Feyman-Kac formula for FBSDEs in weak formulation, both in classical and in viscosity sense. Our new framework is efficient especially when the diffusion part of the forward equation involves the $Z$-component of the backward equation.

Citation: Haiyang Wang, Jianfeng Zhang. Forward backward SDEs in weak formulation. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2018, 8 (3&4) : 1021-1049. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2018044
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
 [1] Shigeaki Koike, Andrzej Świech. Local maximum principle for $L^p$-viscosity solutions of fully nonlinear elliptic PDEs with unbounded coefficients. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2012, 11 (5) : 1897-1910. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2012.11.1897 [2] Francesca Da Lio. Remarks on the strong maximum principle for viscosity solutions to fully nonlinear parabolic equations. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2004, 3 (3) : 395-415. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2004.3.395 [3] Shanjian Tang, Fu Zhang. Path-dependent optimal stochastic control and viscosity solution of associated Bellman equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2015, 35 (11) : 5521-5553. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.5521 [4] Fabio Paronetto. A Harnack type inequality and a maximum principle for an elliptic-parabolic and forward-backward parabolic De Giorgi class. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2017, 10 (4) : 853-866. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2017043 [5] Mei Wang, Zilai Li, Zhenhua Guo. Global weak solution to 3D compressible flows with density-dependent viscosity and free boundary. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2017, 16 (1) : 1-24. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2017001 [6] Guangwu Wang, Boling Guo. Global weak solution to the quantum Navier-Stokes-Landau-Lifshitz equations with density-dependent viscosity. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (11) : 6141-6166. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019133 [7] Laurent Denis, Anis Matoussi, Jing Zhang. The obstacle problem for quasilinear stochastic PDEs with non-homogeneous operator. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2015, 35 (11) : 5185-5202. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.5185 [8] Carlo Orrieri. A stochastic maximum principle with dissipativity conditions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2015, 35 (11) : 5499-5519. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.5499 [9] Yan Wang, Yanxiang Zhao, Lei Wang, Aimin Song, Yanping Ma. Stochastic maximum principle for partial information optimal investment and dividend problem of an insurer. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2018, 14 (2) : 653-671. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017067 [10] Shaolin Ji, Xiaole Xue. A stochastic maximum principle for linear quadratic problem with nonconvex control domain. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2019, 9 (3) : 495-507. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2019022 [11] Guy Barles, Ariela Briani, Emmanuel Trélat. Value function for regional control problems via dynamic programming and Pontryagin maximum principle. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2018, 8 (3&4) : 509-533. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2018021 [12] Doyoon Kim, Seungjin Ryu. The weak maximum principle for second-order elliptic and parabolic conormal derivative problems. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (1) : 493-510. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020024 [13] Alain Hertzog, Antoine Mondoloni. Existence of a weak solution for a quasilinear wave equation with boundary condition. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2002, 1 (2) : 191-219. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2002.1.191 [14] Yue Zheng, Zhongping Wan, Shihui Jia, Guangmin Wang. A new method for strong-weak linear bilevel programming problem. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2015, 11 (2) : 529-547. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2015.11.529 [15] Hyun-Jung Kim. Stochastic parabolic Anderson model with time-homogeneous generalized potential: Mild formulation of solution. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2019, 18 (2) : 795-807. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2019038 [16] Hancheng Guo, Jie Xiong. A second-order stochastic maximum principle for generalized mean-field singular control problem. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2018, 8 (2) : 451-473. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2018018 [17] Toyohiko Aiki, Adrian Muntean. On uniqueness of a weak solution of one-dimensional concrete carbonation problem. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2011, 29 (4) : 1345-1365. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.29.1345 [18] Zhong Tan, Jianfeng Zhou. Higher integrability of weak solution of a nonlinear problem arising in the electrorheological fluids. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2016, 15 (4) : 1335-1350. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2016.15.1335 [19] Manh Hong Duong, Hoang Minh Tran. On the fundamental solution and a variational formulation for a degenerate diffusion of Kolmogorov type. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2018, 38 (7) : 3407-3438. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2018146 [20] H. O. Fattorini. The maximum principle in infinite dimension. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2000, 6 (3) : 557-574. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2000.6.557

2018 Impact Factor: 1.292