American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

2015, 12(6): 1237-1256. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2015.12.1237

Treatment strategies for combining immunostimulatory oncolytic virus therapeutics with dendritic cell injections

 1 Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Richmond, Richmond, VA 2 Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 3 Department of Bioengineering, College of Engineering, Hanyang University, 222 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 133-791 4 Department of Mathematics and Statistics, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, NJ, United States 5 School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW

Received  October 2014 Revised  March 2015 Published  August 2015

Oncolytic viruses (OVs) are used to treat cancer, as they selectively replicate inside of and lyse tumor cells. The efficacy of this process is limited and new OVs are being designed to mediate tumor cell release of cytokines and co-stimulatory molecules, which attract cytotoxic T cells to target tumor cells, thus increasing the tumor-killing effects of OVs. To further promote treatment efficacy, OVs can be combined with other treatments, such as was done by Huang et al., who showed that combining OV injections with dendritic cell (DC) injections was a more effective treatment than either treatment alone. To further investigate this combination, we built a mathematical model consisting of a system of ordinary differential equations and fit the model to the hierarchical data provided from Huang et al. We used the model to determine the effect of varying doses of OV and DC injections and to test alternative treatment strategies. We found that the DC dose given in Huang et al. was near a bifurcation point and that a slightly larger dose could cause complete eradication of the tumor. Further, the model results suggest that it is more effective to treat a tumor with immunostimulatory oncolytic viruses first and then follow-up with a sequence of DCs than to alternate OV and DC injections. This protocol, which was not considered in the experiments of Huang et al., allows the infection to initially thrive before the immune response is enhanced. Taken together, our work shows how the ordering, temporal spacing, and dosage of OV and DC can be chosen to maximize efficacy and to potentially eliminate tumors altogether.
Citation: Joanna R. Wares, Joseph J. Crivelli, Chae-Ok Yun, Il-Kyu Choi, Jana L. Gevertz, Peter S. Kim. Treatment strategies for combining immunostimulatory oncolytic virus therapeutics with dendritic cell injections. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2015, 12 (6) : 1237-1256. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2015.12.1237
References:

show all references

References:
 [1] Zizi Wang, Zhiming Guo, Huaqin Peng. Dynamical behavior of a new oncolytic virotherapy model based on gene variation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2017, 10 (5) : 1079-1093. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2017058 [2] Joseph Malinzi, Rachid Ouifki, Amina Eladdadi, Delfim F. M. Torres, K. A. Jane White. Enhancement of chemotherapy using oncolytic virotherapy: Mathematical and optimal control analysis. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2018, 15 (6) : 1435-1463. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2018066 [3] Elzbieta Ratajczyk, Urszula Ledzewicz, Maciej Leszczynski, Avner Friedman. The role of TNF-α inhibitor in glioma virotherapy: A mathematical model. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2017, 14 (1) : 305-319. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2017020 [4] Zindoga Mukandavire, Abba B. Gumel, Winston Garira, Jean Michel Tchuenche. Mathematical analysis of a model for HIV-malaria co-infection. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2009, 6 (2) : 333-362. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2009.6.333 [5] Daniel Vasiliu, Jianjun Paul Tian. Periodic solutions of a model for tumor virotherapy. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2011, 4 (6) : 1587-1597. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2011.4.1587 [6] Jianjun Paul Tian. The replicability of oncolytic virus: Defining conditions in tumor virotherapy. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2011, 8 (3) : 841-860. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2011.8.841 [7] Marcello Delitala, Tommaso Lorenzi. Emergence of spatial patterns in a mathematical model for the co-culture dynamics of epithelial-like and mesenchymal-like cells. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2017, 14 (1) : 79-93. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2017006 [8] Sebastián Ferrer, Francisco Crespo. Parametric quartic Hamiltonian model. A unified treatment of classic integrable systems. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2014, 6 (4) : 479-502. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2014.6.479 [9] Ghendrih Philippe, Hauray Maxime, Anne Nouri. Derivation of a gyrokinetic model. Existence and uniqueness of specific stationary solution. Kinetic & Related Models, 2009, 2 (4) : 707-725. doi: 10.3934/krm.2009.2.707 [10] Bernard Dacorogna, Alessandro Ferriero. Regularity and selecting principles for implicit ordinary differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2009, 11 (1) : 87-101. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2009.11.87 [11] Zvi Artstein. Averaging of ordinary differential equations with slowly varying averages. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2010, 14 (2) : 353-365. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.14.353 [12] Faker Ben Belgacem. Uniqueness for an ill-posed reaction-dispersion model. Application to organic pollution in stream-waters. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2012, 6 (2) : 163-181. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2012.6.163 [13] Baba Issa Camara, Houda Mokrani, Evans K. Afenya. Mathematical modeling of glioma therapy using oncolytic viruses. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2013, 10 (3) : 565-578. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.565 [14] W. Sarlet, G. E. Prince, M. Crampin. Generalized submersiveness of second-order ordinary differential equations. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2009, 1 (2) : 209-221. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2009.1.209 [15] Stefano Maset. Conditioning and relative error propagation in linear autonomous ordinary differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2018, 23 (7) : 2879-2909. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018165 [16] Aeeman Fatima, F. M. Mahomed, Chaudry Masood Khalique. Conditional symmetries of nonlinear third-order ordinary differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2018, 11 (4) : 655-666. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2018040 [17] Hongwei Lou, Weihan Wang. Optimal blowup/quenching time for controlled autonomous ordinary differential equations. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2015, 5 (3) : 517-527. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2015.5.517 [18] Jean Mawhin, James R. Ward Jr. Guiding-like functions for periodic or bounded solutions of ordinary differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2002, 8 (1) : 39-54. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2002.8.39 [19] Iasson Karafyllis, Lars Grüne. Feedback stabilization methods for the numerical solution of ordinary differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2011, 16 (1) : 283-317. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2011.16.283 [20] Alessandro Fonda, Fabio Zanolin. Bounded solutions of nonlinear second order ordinary differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 1998, 4 (1) : 91-98. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1998.4.91

2018 Impact Factor: 1.313