• Previous Article
    A new interpretation of the progressive hedging algorithm for multistage stochastic minimization problems
  • JIMO Home
  • This Issue
  • Next Article
    Multicriteria investment problem with Savage's risk criteria: Theoretical aspects of stability and case study
doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019037

Impact of risk aversion on two-echelon supply chain systems with carbon emission reduction constraints

1. 

Institute of Operations Research, School of Management, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao, Shandong 276826, China

2. 

Department of Health Services and Outcomes Research, National Healthcare Group, 138543, Singapore

* Corresponding author

Received  June 2018 Revised  November 2018 Published  May 2019

Fund Project: The research is partly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant 71771138, Humanities and Social Sciences Youth Foundation of Ministry of Education of China under grant 17YJC630004, Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China under Grant ZR2017MG009, and Special Foundation for Taishan Scholars of Shandong Province, China under Grant tsqn201812061

This study examines a two-echelon supply chain consisting of two competing manufacturers and one retailer that has the channel power, in which one manufacturer is engaged in sustainable technology to curb carbon emissions under the cap-and-trade regulation while the other one operates its business as usual in a traditional manner. Two different supply chain configurations concerning risk attributes of the agents are considered, that is, (ⅰ) two risk-neutral manufacturers with one risk-averse retailer; and (ⅱ) two risk-averse manufacturers with one risk-neutral retailer. Under the mean-variance framework, we use a retailer-leader game optimization approach to study operational decisions of these two systems. Specifically, optimal operational decisions of the agents are established in closed-form expressions and the corresponding profits and carbon emissions are assessed. Numerical experiments are conducted to analyze the impact of risk aversion of the underlying supply chains. The results show that each risk-averse agent would benefit from a low scale risk aversion. Further, low carbon emissions could be attainable if risk aversion scale of the underlying manufacturer is small or moderate. In addition, the carbon emissions might increase when risk aversion of the traditional manufacturer or the retailer is of small or moderate scale.

Citation: Qingguo Bai, Fanwen Meng. Impact of risk aversion on two-echelon supply chain systems with carbon emission reduction constraints. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019037
References:
[1]

T. AvinadavT. Chernonog and Y. Perlman, Consignment contract for mobile apps between a single retailer and compertitive developers with different risk attitudes, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 246 (2015), 949-957. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.05.016. Google Scholar

[2]

Q. BaiM. Chen and L. Xu, Revenue and promotional cost-sharing contract versus two-part tariff contract in coordinating sustainable supply chain systems with deteriorating items, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 187 (2017), 85-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.02.012. Google Scholar

[3]

E. BazanM. Y. Jaber and S. Zanoni, A review of mathematical inventory models for reverse logistics and the future of its modeling: An environmental perspective, Appl. Math. Model., 40 (2016), 4151-4178. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2015.11.027. Google Scholar

[4]

P. BeskeA. Land and S. Seuring, Sustainable supply chain management practices and dynamic capabilities in the food industry: A critical analysis of the literature, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 152 (2014), 131-143. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.12.026. Google Scholar

[5]

M. Bonney and M. Y. Jaber, Environmentally responsible inventory models: Non-classical models for a non-classical era, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 133 (2011), 43-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.10.033. Google Scholar

[6]

J. Bull, Loads of green washing–can behavioural economics increase willingness-to-pay for efficient washing machines in the UK?, Energ. Policy., 50 (2012), 242-252. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.07.001. Google Scholar

[7]

B. CaoZ. Xiao and X. Li, Joint decision on pricing and waste emission level in industrial symbiosis chain, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 14 (2018), 135-164. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017040. Google Scholar

[8]

X. ChenG. Hao and L. Li, Channel coordination with a loss-averse retailer and option contracts, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 150 (2014), 52-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.12.004. Google Scholar

[9]

C. H. Chiu and T. M. Choi, Supply chain risk analysis with mean-variance models: A technical review, Ann. Oper. Res., 240 (2016), 489-507. doi: 10.1007/s10479-013-1386-4. Google Scholar

[10]

T. M. ChoiD. LiH. Yan and C. H. Chiu, Channel coordination in supply chains with agents having mean-variance objectives, Omega, 36 (2008), 565-576. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2006.12.003. Google Scholar

[11]

C. DongB. ShenP. S. ChowL. Yang and C. To Ng, Sustainability investment under cap-and-trade regulation, Ann. Oper. Res., 240 (2016), 509-531. doi: 10.1007/s10479-013-1514-1. Google Scholar

[12]

S. DuL. ZhuL. Liang and F. Ma, Emission-dependent supply chain and environment-policy-making in the 'cap-and-trade' system, Energ. Policy., 57 (2013), 61-67. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.042. Google Scholar

[13]

S. DuL. Hu and L. Wang, Low-carbon supply policies and supply chain performance with carbon concerned demand, Ann. Oper. Res., 255 (2017), 569-590. doi: 10.1007/s10479-015-1988-0. Google Scholar

[14]

European Commission, Attitudes of Europeans citizens towards the environment, Eurobarometer, 295(2008), Available from: http://www.ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/archives/ebs/ebs_295_en.pdfGoogle Scholar

[15]

European Commission, 2013. Available from: http://www.ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/ets/index_en.htm.Google Scholar

[16]

X. Gan, S. P. Sethi and H. Yan, Coordination of supply chains with risk-averse agents, Supply Chain Coordination under Uncertainty, (2011), 3–31. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-19257-9_1. Google Scholar

[17]

D. HeX. Chen and Q. Huang, Influences of carbon emission abatement on firms' production policy based on newsboy model, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 13 (2017), 251-265. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016015. Google Scholar

[18]

M. Y. JaberC. H. Glock and A. M. A. El Saadany, Supply chain coordination with emissions reduction incentives, Int. J. Prod. Res., 51 (2013), 69-82. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2011.651656. Google Scholar

[19]

J. JiZ. Zhang and L. Yang, Comparisons of initial carbon allowance allocation rules in an O2O retail supply chain with the cap-and-trade regulation, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 187 (2017), 68-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.02.011. Google Scholar

[20]

J. JiZ. Zhang and L. Yang, Carbon emission reduction decisions in the retail-/dual-channel supply chain with consumers' preference, J. Clean. Prod., 141 (2017), 852-867. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.135. Google Scholar

[21]

J. LiT. M. Choi and T. C. E. Cheng, Mean variance analysis of fast fashion supply chains with returns policy, IEEE. Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern. Syst., 44 (2014), 422-434. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2013.2264934. Google Scholar

[22]

Q. LiB. LiP. Chen and P. Hou, Dual-channel supply chain decisions under asymmetric information with a risk-averse retailer, Ann. Oper. Res., 257 (2017), 423-447. doi: 10.1007/s10479-015-1852-2. Google Scholar

[23]

W. Liu and Y. Wang, Quality control game model in logistics service supply chain based on different combinations of risk attitude, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 161 (2015), 181-191. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.12.026. Google Scholar

[24]

S. Ohmura and H. Matsuo, The effect of risk aversion on distribution channel contracts: Implications for return policies, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 176 (2016), 29-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.02.019. Google Scholar

[25]

S. K. PaulR. Sarker and D. Essam, Managing risk and disruption in production-inventory and supply chain systems: A review, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 12 (2016), 1009-1029. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016.12.1009. Google Scholar

[26]

Q. QiJ. Wang and Q. Bai, Pricing decision of a two-echelon supply chain with one supplier and two retailers under a carbon cap regulation, J. Clean. Prod., 151 (2017), 286-302. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.011. Google Scholar

[27]

Y. ShenJ. Xie and T. Li, The risk-averse newsvendor game with competition on demand, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 12 (2016), 931-947. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016.12.931. Google Scholar

[28]

F. TaoT. Fan and K. K. Lai, Optimal inventory control policy and supplly chain coordination problem with carbon footprint constraints, Int. T. Oper. Res., 25 (2018), 1831-1853. doi: 10.1111/itor.12271. Google Scholar

[29]

C. WangW. Wang and R. Huang, Supply chain enterprise operations and government carbon tax decisions considering carbon emissions, J. Clean. Prod., 152 (2017), 271-280. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.051. Google Scholar

[30]

X. WangY. Lan and W. Tang, An uncertain wage contract model for risk-averse worker under bilateral moral hazard, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 13 (2017), 1815-1840. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017020. Google Scholar

[31]

L. XiaT. GuoJ. QinX. Yue and N. Zhu, Carbon emission redcution and pricing policies of a supply chain considering reciprocal preferences in cap-and-trade system, Ann. Oper. Res., 268 (2018), 149-175. doi: 10.1007/s10479-017-2657-2. Google Scholar

[32]

T. Xiao and T. M. Choi, Purchasing choices and channel structure strategies for a two-echelon system with risk-averse players, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 120 (2009), 54-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.07.028. Google Scholar

[33]

T. Xiao and T. Xu, Pricing and product line strategy in a supply chain with risk-averse players, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 156 (2014), 305-315. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.06.021. Google Scholar

[34]

T. Xiao and D. Yang, Price and service competition of supply chains with riks-averse retailers under demand uncertainty, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 114 (2008), 187-200. Google Scholar

[35]

G. XieW. Yue and S. Wang, Optimal selection of cleaner productions in a green supply chain with risk aversion, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 11 (2015), 515-528. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2015.11.515. Google Scholar

[36]

J. XuY. Chen and Q. Bai, A two-echelon sustainable supply chain coordination under cap-and-trade regulation, J. Clean. Prod., 135 (2016), 42-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.047. Google Scholar

[37]

X. XuP. HeH. Xu and Q. Zhang, Supply chain coordiantion with green technology under cap-and-trade regulation, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 183 (2017), 433-442. Google Scholar

[38]

X. XuW. ZhangP. He and X. Xu, Production and pricing problems in make-to-order supply chain with cap-and-trade regulation, Omega, 66 (2017), 248-257. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2015.08.006. Google Scholar

[39]

W. XueT. M. Choi and L. Ma, Diversification strategy with random yield suppliers for a mean-variance risk-sensitive manufacturer, Transpor. Res. E-Log., 90 (2016), 90-107. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2016.01.013. Google Scholar

[40]

H. Yang and W. Chen, Retailer-driven carbon emission abatement with consumer environmental awareness and carbon tax: Revenue-sharing versus Cost-sharing, Omega, 78 (2018), 179-191. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2017.06.012. Google Scholar

[41]

L. YangQ. Zhang and J. Ji, Pricing and carbon emission recuction decisions in supply chains with vertical and horizontal cooperation, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 191 (2017), 286-297. Google Scholar

[42]

L. ZhangJ. Wang and J. You, Consumer environmetal awareness and channel coordination with two substitutable products, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 241 (2015), 63-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.07.043. Google Scholar

[43]

J. ZhaoJ. Wei and Y. Li, Pricing and remanufacturing decisions for two substitutable products with a common retailer, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 13 (2017), 1125-1147. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016065. Google Scholar

[44]

Y. ZhaoT. M. ChoiT. C. E. Cheng and S. Wang, Mean-risk analysis of wholesale price contracts with stochastic price-dependent demand, Ann. Oper. Res., 257 (2017), 491-518. doi: 10.1007/s10479-014-1689-0. Google Scholar

[45]

Y. ZhouZ. ShenR. Ying and X. Xu, A loss-averse two-product odering model with information updating in two-echelon inventory system, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 14 (2018), 687-705. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017069. Google Scholar

[46]

Y. ZuL. Chen and Y. Fan, Research on low-carbon strategies in supply chain with environmental regulations based on differential game, J. Clean. Prod., 177 (2018), 527-546. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.220. Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

T. AvinadavT. Chernonog and Y. Perlman, Consignment contract for mobile apps between a single retailer and compertitive developers with different risk attitudes, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 246 (2015), 949-957. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.05.016. Google Scholar

[2]

Q. BaiM. Chen and L. Xu, Revenue and promotional cost-sharing contract versus two-part tariff contract in coordinating sustainable supply chain systems with deteriorating items, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 187 (2017), 85-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.02.012. Google Scholar

[3]

E. BazanM. Y. Jaber and S. Zanoni, A review of mathematical inventory models for reverse logistics and the future of its modeling: An environmental perspective, Appl. Math. Model., 40 (2016), 4151-4178. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2015.11.027. Google Scholar

[4]

P. BeskeA. Land and S. Seuring, Sustainable supply chain management practices and dynamic capabilities in the food industry: A critical analysis of the literature, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 152 (2014), 131-143. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.12.026. Google Scholar

[5]

M. Bonney and M. Y. Jaber, Environmentally responsible inventory models: Non-classical models for a non-classical era, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 133 (2011), 43-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.10.033. Google Scholar

[6]

J. Bull, Loads of green washing–can behavioural economics increase willingness-to-pay for efficient washing machines in the UK?, Energ. Policy., 50 (2012), 242-252. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.07.001. Google Scholar

[7]

B. CaoZ. Xiao and X. Li, Joint decision on pricing and waste emission level in industrial symbiosis chain, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 14 (2018), 135-164. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017040. Google Scholar

[8]

X. ChenG. Hao and L. Li, Channel coordination with a loss-averse retailer and option contracts, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 150 (2014), 52-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.12.004. Google Scholar

[9]

C. H. Chiu and T. M. Choi, Supply chain risk analysis with mean-variance models: A technical review, Ann. Oper. Res., 240 (2016), 489-507. doi: 10.1007/s10479-013-1386-4. Google Scholar

[10]

T. M. ChoiD. LiH. Yan and C. H. Chiu, Channel coordination in supply chains with agents having mean-variance objectives, Omega, 36 (2008), 565-576. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2006.12.003. Google Scholar

[11]

C. DongB. ShenP. S. ChowL. Yang and C. To Ng, Sustainability investment under cap-and-trade regulation, Ann. Oper. Res., 240 (2016), 509-531. doi: 10.1007/s10479-013-1514-1. Google Scholar

[12]

S. DuL. ZhuL. Liang and F. Ma, Emission-dependent supply chain and environment-policy-making in the 'cap-and-trade' system, Energ. Policy., 57 (2013), 61-67. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.042. Google Scholar

[13]

S. DuL. Hu and L. Wang, Low-carbon supply policies and supply chain performance with carbon concerned demand, Ann. Oper. Res., 255 (2017), 569-590. doi: 10.1007/s10479-015-1988-0. Google Scholar

[14]

European Commission, Attitudes of Europeans citizens towards the environment, Eurobarometer, 295(2008), Available from: http://www.ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/archives/ebs/ebs_295_en.pdfGoogle Scholar

[15]

European Commission, 2013. Available from: http://www.ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/ets/index_en.htm.Google Scholar

[16]

X. Gan, S. P. Sethi and H. Yan, Coordination of supply chains with risk-averse agents, Supply Chain Coordination under Uncertainty, (2011), 3–31. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-19257-9_1. Google Scholar

[17]

D. HeX. Chen and Q. Huang, Influences of carbon emission abatement on firms' production policy based on newsboy model, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 13 (2017), 251-265. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016015. Google Scholar

[18]

M. Y. JaberC. H. Glock and A. M. A. El Saadany, Supply chain coordination with emissions reduction incentives, Int. J. Prod. Res., 51 (2013), 69-82. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2011.651656. Google Scholar

[19]

J. JiZ. Zhang and L. Yang, Comparisons of initial carbon allowance allocation rules in an O2O retail supply chain with the cap-and-trade regulation, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 187 (2017), 68-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.02.011. Google Scholar

[20]

J. JiZ. Zhang and L. Yang, Carbon emission reduction decisions in the retail-/dual-channel supply chain with consumers' preference, J. Clean. Prod., 141 (2017), 852-867. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.135. Google Scholar

[21]

J. LiT. M. Choi and T. C. E. Cheng, Mean variance analysis of fast fashion supply chains with returns policy, IEEE. Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern. Syst., 44 (2014), 422-434. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2013.2264934. Google Scholar

[22]

Q. LiB. LiP. Chen and P. Hou, Dual-channel supply chain decisions under asymmetric information with a risk-averse retailer, Ann. Oper. Res., 257 (2017), 423-447. doi: 10.1007/s10479-015-1852-2. Google Scholar

[23]

W. Liu and Y. Wang, Quality control game model in logistics service supply chain based on different combinations of risk attitude, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 161 (2015), 181-191. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.12.026. Google Scholar

[24]

S. Ohmura and H. Matsuo, The effect of risk aversion on distribution channel contracts: Implications for return policies, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 176 (2016), 29-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.02.019. Google Scholar

[25]

S. K. PaulR. Sarker and D. Essam, Managing risk and disruption in production-inventory and supply chain systems: A review, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 12 (2016), 1009-1029. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016.12.1009. Google Scholar

[26]

Q. QiJ. Wang and Q. Bai, Pricing decision of a two-echelon supply chain with one supplier and two retailers under a carbon cap regulation, J. Clean. Prod., 151 (2017), 286-302. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.011. Google Scholar

[27]

Y. ShenJ. Xie and T. Li, The risk-averse newsvendor game with competition on demand, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 12 (2016), 931-947. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016.12.931. Google Scholar

[28]

F. TaoT. Fan and K. K. Lai, Optimal inventory control policy and supplly chain coordination problem with carbon footprint constraints, Int. T. Oper. Res., 25 (2018), 1831-1853. doi: 10.1111/itor.12271. Google Scholar

[29]

C. WangW. Wang and R. Huang, Supply chain enterprise operations and government carbon tax decisions considering carbon emissions, J. Clean. Prod., 152 (2017), 271-280. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.051. Google Scholar

[30]

X. WangY. Lan and W. Tang, An uncertain wage contract model for risk-averse worker under bilateral moral hazard, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 13 (2017), 1815-1840. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017020. Google Scholar

[31]

L. XiaT. GuoJ. QinX. Yue and N. Zhu, Carbon emission redcution and pricing policies of a supply chain considering reciprocal preferences in cap-and-trade system, Ann. Oper. Res., 268 (2018), 149-175. doi: 10.1007/s10479-017-2657-2. Google Scholar

[32]

T. Xiao and T. M. Choi, Purchasing choices and channel structure strategies for a two-echelon system with risk-averse players, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 120 (2009), 54-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.07.028. Google Scholar

[33]

T. Xiao and T. Xu, Pricing and product line strategy in a supply chain with risk-averse players, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 156 (2014), 305-315. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.06.021. Google Scholar

[34]

T. Xiao and D. Yang, Price and service competition of supply chains with riks-averse retailers under demand uncertainty, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 114 (2008), 187-200. Google Scholar

[35]

G. XieW. Yue and S. Wang, Optimal selection of cleaner productions in a green supply chain with risk aversion, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 11 (2015), 515-528. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2015.11.515. Google Scholar

[36]

J. XuY. Chen and Q. Bai, A two-echelon sustainable supply chain coordination under cap-and-trade regulation, J. Clean. Prod., 135 (2016), 42-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.047. Google Scholar

[37]

X. XuP. HeH. Xu and Q. Zhang, Supply chain coordiantion with green technology under cap-and-trade regulation, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 183 (2017), 433-442. Google Scholar

[38]

X. XuW. ZhangP. He and X. Xu, Production and pricing problems in make-to-order supply chain with cap-and-trade regulation, Omega, 66 (2017), 248-257. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2015.08.006. Google Scholar

[39]

W. XueT. M. Choi and L. Ma, Diversification strategy with random yield suppliers for a mean-variance risk-sensitive manufacturer, Transpor. Res. E-Log., 90 (2016), 90-107. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2016.01.013. Google Scholar

[40]

H. Yang and W. Chen, Retailer-driven carbon emission abatement with consumer environmental awareness and carbon tax: Revenue-sharing versus Cost-sharing, Omega, 78 (2018), 179-191. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2017.06.012. Google Scholar

[41]

L. YangQ. Zhang and J. Ji, Pricing and carbon emission recuction decisions in supply chains with vertical and horizontal cooperation, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 191 (2017), 286-297. Google Scholar

[42]

L. ZhangJ. Wang and J. You, Consumer environmetal awareness and channel coordination with two substitutable products, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 241 (2015), 63-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.07.043. Google Scholar

[43]

J. ZhaoJ. Wei and Y. Li, Pricing and remanufacturing decisions for two substitutable products with a common retailer, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 13 (2017), 1125-1147. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016065. Google Scholar

[44]

Y. ZhaoT. M. ChoiT. C. E. Cheng and S. Wang, Mean-risk analysis of wholesale price contracts with stochastic price-dependent demand, Ann. Oper. Res., 257 (2017), 491-518. doi: 10.1007/s10479-014-1689-0. Google Scholar

[45]

Y. ZhouZ. ShenR. Ying and X. Xu, A loss-averse two-product odering model with information updating in two-echelon inventory system, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 14 (2018), 687-705. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017069. Google Scholar

[46]

Y. ZuL. Chen and Y. Fan, Research on low-carbon strategies in supply chain with environmental regulations based on differential game, J. Clean. Prod., 177 (2018), 527-546. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.220. Google Scholar

Figure 1.  Effects of $ \lambda_{r} $ on DM$ _{1} $
Figure 2.  Effects of $ \lambda_{m_{1}} $ on DM$ _{2} $
Figure 3.  Effects of $ \lambda_{m_{2}} $ on DM$ _{2} $
Table 1.  The optimal solutions for DM$ _{1} $
Decentralized Model 1 $ w^{*}_{1} $ $ w^{*}_{2} $ $ s^{*} $ $ p^{*}_{1} $ $ p^{*}_{2} $
$ C = 9000 $ 422.5471 207.3770 8.0263 483.9910297.6065
$ C = 12569 $ 422.5471 207.3770 8.0263 483.9910 297.6065
$ C = 15000 $ 422.5471 207.3770 8.0263 483.9910 297.6065
Decentralized Model 1 $ w^{*}_{1} $ $ w^{*}_{2} $ $ s^{*} $ $ p^{*}_{1} $ $ p^{*}_{2} $
$ C = 9000 $ 422.5471 207.3770 8.0263 483.9910297.6065
$ C = 12569 $ 422.5471 207.3770 8.0263 483.9910 297.6065
$ C = 15000 $ 422.5471 207.3770 8.0263 483.9910 297.6065
Table 2.  The optimal profits and carbon emissions for DM$ _{1} $
Decentralized Model 1 $ U^{*}(\pi_{r}) $ $ E^{*}(\pi_{m_{1}}) $ $ E^{*}(\pi_{m_{2}}) $ $ J(s^{*}) $
$ C = 9000 $ 17,627 57,17031,16612,569
$ C = 12569 $ 17,627 67,877 31,166 12,569
$ C = 15000 $ 17,627 75,170 31,166 12,569
Decentralized Model 1 $ U^{*}(\pi_{r}) $ $ E^{*}(\pi_{m_{1}}) $ $ E^{*}(\pi_{m_{2}}) $ $ J(s^{*}) $
$ C = 9000 $ 17,627 57,17031,16612,569
$ C = 12569 $ 17,627 67,877 31,166 12,569
$ C = 15000 $ 17,627 75,170 31,166 12,569
Table 3.  The optimal solutions for DM$ _{2} $
Decentralized Model 2 $ w^{**}_{1} $ $ w^{**}_{2} $ $ s^{**} $ $ p^{**}_{1} $ $ p^{**}_{2} $
$ C = 9000 $ 298.4721 67.4862 2.1871506.5056311.8028
$ C = 11416 $ 298.4721 67.4862 2.1871506.5056311.8028
$ C = 15000 $ 298.4721 67.4862 2.1871506.5056311.8028
Decentralized Model 2 $ w^{**}_{1} $ $ w^{**}_{2} $ $ s^{**} $ $ p^{**}_{1} $ $ p^{**}_{2} $
$ C = 9000 $ 298.4721 67.4862 2.1871506.5056311.8028
$ C = 11416 $ 298.4721 67.4862 2.1871506.5056311.8028
$ C = 15000 $ 298.4721 67.4862 2.1871506.5056311.8028
Table 4.  The optimal profits and carbon emissions for DM$ _{2} $
Decentralized Model 2 $ E^{**}(\pi_{r}) $ $ U^{**}(\pi_{m_{1}}) $ $ U^{**}(\pi_{m_{2}}) $ $ J(s^{**}) $
$ C = 9000 $ 66,868 31,809 5617.911,416
$ C = 11416 $ 66,86839,057 5617.911,416
$ C = 15000 $ 66,868 49,8095617.911,416
Decentralized Model 2 $ E^{**}(\pi_{r}) $ $ U^{**}(\pi_{m_{1}}) $ $ U^{**}(\pi_{m_{2}}) $ $ J(s^{**}) $
$ C = 9000 $ 66,868 31,809 5617.911,416
$ C = 11416 $ 66,86839,057 5617.911,416
$ C = 15000 $ 66,868 49,8095617.911,416
[1]

Jing Feng, Yanfei Lan, Ruiqing Zhao. Impact of price cap regulation on supply chain contracting between two monopolists. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (1) : 349-373. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016021

[2]

Gang Xie, Wuyi Yue, Shouyang Wang. Optimal selection of cleaner products in a green supply chain with risk aversion. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2015, 11 (2) : 515-528. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2015.11.515

[3]

Prasenjit Pramanik, Sarama Malik Das, Manas Kumar Maiti. Note on : Supply chain inventory model for deteriorating items with maximum lifetime and partial trade credit to credit risk customers. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2019, 15 (3) : 1289-1315. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018096

[4]

Xue-Yan Wu, Zhi-Ping Fan, Bing-Bing Cao. Cost-sharing strategy for carbon emission reduction and sales effort: A nash game with government subsidy. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (5) : 1-29. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019040

[5]

Yeong-Cheng Liou, Siegfried Schaible, Jen-Chih Yao. Supply chain inventory management via a Stackelberg equilibrium. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2006, 2 (1) : 81-94. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2006.2.81

[6]

Sanjoy Kumar Paul, Ruhul Sarker, Daryl Essam. Managing risk and disruption in production-inventory and supply chain systems: A review. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2016, 12 (3) : 1009-1029. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016.12.1009

[7]

Min Li, Jiahua Zhang, Yifan Xu, Wei Wang. Effect of disruption risk on a supply chain with price-dependent demand. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (5) : 1-21. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019095

[8]

Pin-Shou Ting. The EPQ model with deteriorating items under two levels of trade credit in a supply chain system. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2015, 11 (2) : 479-492. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2015.11.479

[9]

Kun-Jen Chung, Pin-Shou Ting. The inventory model under supplier's partial trade credit policy in a supply chain system. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2015, 11 (4) : 1175-1183. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2015.11.1175

[10]

Qiang Lin, Ying Peng, Ying Hu. Supplier financing service decisions for a capital-constrained supply chain: Trade credit vs. combined credit financing. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (5) : 1-22. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019026

[11]

Amin Aalaei, Hamid Davoudpour. Two bounds for integrating the virtual dynamic cellular manufacturing problem into supply chain management. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2016, 12 (3) : 907-930. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016.12.907

[12]

Jun Li, Hairong Feng, Kun-Jen Chung. Using the algebraic approach to determine the replenishment optimal policy with defective products, backlog and delay of payments in the supply chain management. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2012, 8 (1) : 263-269. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2012.8.263

[13]

Dayi He, Xiaoling Chen, Qi Huang. Influences of carbon emission abatement on firms' production policy based on newsboy model. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (1) : 251-265. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016015

[14]

O. İlker Kolak, Orhan Feyzioğlu, Ş. İlker Birbil, Nilay Noyan, Semih Yalçindağ. Using emission functions in modeling environmentally sustainable traffic assignment policies. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2013, 9 (2) : 341-363. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2013.9.341

[15]

Huaying Guo, Jin Liang. An optimal control model of carbon reduction and trading. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2016, 6 (4) : 535-550. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2016015

[16]

Biswajit Sarkar, Arunava Majumder, Mitali Sarkar, Bikash Koli Dey, Gargi Roy. Two-echelon supply chain model with manufacturing quality improvement and setup cost reduction. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (2) : 1085-1104. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016063

[17]

Jiuping Xu, Pei Wei. Production-distribution planning of construction supply chain management under fuzzy random environment for large-scale construction projects. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2013, 9 (1) : 31-56. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2013.9.31

[18]

Andrew P. Sage. Risk in system of systems engineering and management. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2008, 4 (3) : 477-487. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2008.4.477

[19]

Shuhua Zhang, Xinyu Wang, Song Wang. Modeling and computation of energy efficiency management with emission permits trading. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2018, 14 (4) : 1349-1365. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018010

[20]

Binbin Cao, Zhongdong Xiao, Xiaojun Li. Joint decision on pricing and waste emission level in industrial symbiosis chain. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2018, 14 (1) : 135-164. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017040

2018 Impact Factor: 1.025

Article outline

Figures and Tables

[Back to Top]