# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019006

## Pricing options on investment project contraction and ownership transfer using a finite volume scheme and an interior penalty method

 1 Department of Mathematics & Statistics, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, WA 6845, Australia 2 School of Mathematical & Software Sciences, Sichuan Normal University, Sichuan, China, 610000 3 Coordinated Innovation Center for Computable Modeling in Management Science, Tianjin University of Finance and Economics Tianjin 300222, China

Received  February 2018 Revised  September 2018 Published  March 2019

In this work we develop partial differential equation (PDE) based computational models for pricing real options to contract the production or to transfer part/all of the ownership of a project when the underlying asset price of the project satisfies a geometric Brownian motion. The developed models are similar to the Black-Scholes equation for valuing conventional European put options or the partial differential linear complementarity problem (LCP) for pricing American put options. A finite volume method is used for the discretization of the PDE models and a penalty approach is applied to the discretized LCP. We show that the coefficient matrix of the discretized systems is a positive-definite $M$-matrix which guarantees that the solution from the penalty equation converges to that of the discretized LCP. Numerical experiments, performed to demonstrate the usefulness of our methods, show that our models and numerical methods are able to produce financially meaningful numerical results for the two non-trivial test problems.

Citation: Nan Li, Song Wang, Shuhua Zhang. Pricing options on investment project contraction and ownership transfer using a finite volume scheme and an interior penalty method. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019006
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
The values of European and American contracting options when $\kappa = 0.5$ for Test 1
The difference between the values of the European and American contracting options for Test 1
The value of the option to abandon for Test 2
Computed $W - W^*$ and Greeks of $W$ when $\lambda = 0.5$ for Test 2
The American option value and its optimal exercise curve for $\lambda = 0.5$ for Test 2
Project, production and market data and functions used in Test 1
 $Q = 10^4$ million tons $B = 30\%$ per annum $c_0 = {\rm{US}}$ ＄25 $c(t) = c_0\times e^{0.005t}$ $R = 5\%$ per annum $r = 0.06$ per annum $C = {\rm{US}}$ ＄ $5 \times 10^2$ million $T = 1$ year $\sigma = 30\%$ $\delta = 0.02$ {{q}_{0}}=\left\{ \begin{array}{*{35}{l}} \begin{align} &0.01Q\times {{e}^{0.007t}},\ \ t\le T_{1}^{*}, \\ &0,\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ t\in (T_{1}^{*},{{T}^{*}}) \\ \end{align} \\ \end{array} \right. {{q}_{1}}=\left\{ \begin{align} &0.01Q\times {{e}^{0.007t}},\ \ \ \ \ t Q = 10^4$million tons$B = 30\%$per annum$c_0 = {\rm{US}} $＄25$c(t) = c_0\times e^{0.005t}  R = 5\%$per annum$r = 0.06 $per annum$C = {\rm{US}}$＄$5 \times 10^2$million$T = 1$year$\sigma = 30\% \delta = 0.02{{q}_{0}}=\left\{ \begin{array}{*{35}{l}} \begin{align} &0.01Q\times {{e}^{0.007t}},\ \ t\le T_{1}^{*}, \\ &0,\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ t\in (T_{1}^{*},{{T}^{*}}) \\ \end{align} \\ \end{array} \right.{{q}_{1}}=\left\{ \begin{align} &0.01Q\times {{e}^{0.007t}},\ \ \ \ \ t
 [1] Wen Chen, Song Wang. A finite difference method for pricing European and American options under a geometric Lévy process. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2015, 11 (1) : 241-264. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2015.11.241 [2] Kai Zhang, Kok Lay Teo. A penalty-based method from reconstructing smooth local volatility surface from American options. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2015, 11 (2) : 631-644. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2015.11.631 [3] Wen Li, Song Wang. Pricing American options under proportional transaction costs using a penalty approach and a finite difference scheme. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2013, 9 (2) : 365-389. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2013.9.365 [4] Xiaoyu Xing, Hailiang Yang. American type geometric step options. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2013, 9 (3) : 549-560. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2013.9.549 [5] Fengming Ma, Yiju Wang, Hongge Zhao. A potential reduction method for the generalized linear complementarity problem over a polyhedral cone. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2010, 6 (1) : 259-267. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2010.6.259 [6] Walter Allegretto, Yanping Lin, Ningning Yan. A posteriori error analysis for FEM of American options. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2006, 6 (5) : 957-978. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2006.6.957 [7] Ming-Zheng Wang, M. Montaz Ali. Penalty-based SAA method of stochastic nonlinear complementarity problems. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2010, 6 (1) : 241-257. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2010.6.241 [8] Shuhua Zhang, Xinyu Wang, Hua Li. Modeling and computation of water management by real options. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2018, 14 (1) : 81-103. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017038 [9] Christos V. Nikolopoulos, Georgios E. Zouraris. Numerical solution of a non-local elliptic problem modeling a thermistor with a finite element and a finite volume method. Conference Publications, 2007, 2007 (Special) : 768-778. doi: 10.3934/proc.2007.2007.768 [10] Liuyang Yuan, Zhongping Wan, Jingjing Zhang, Bin Sun. A filled function method for solving nonlinear complementarity problem. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2009, 5 (4) : 911-928. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2009.5.911 [11] Yibing Lv, Tiesong Hu, Jianlin Jiang. Penalty method-based equilibrium point approach for solving the linear bilevel multiobjective programming problem. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2018, 0 (0) : 0-0. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020102 [12] Kai Zhang, Song Wang. Convergence property of an interior penalty approach to pricing American option. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2011, 7 (2) : 435-447. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2011.7.435 [13] Wei Wang, Linyi Qian, Xiaonan Su. Pricing and hedging catastrophe equity put options under a Markov-modulated jump diffusion model. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2015, 11 (2) : 493-514. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2015.11.493 [14] Pierangelo Ciurlia. On a general class of free boundary problems for European-style installment options with continuous payment plan. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2011, 10 (4) : 1205-1224. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2011.10.1205 [15] Hwa-Sung Kim, Bara Kim, Jerim Kim. Catastrophe equity put options under stochastic volatility and catastrophe-dependent jumps. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2014, 10 (1) : 41-55. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2014.10.41 [16] Fang Zeng, Pablo Suarez, Jiguang Sun. A decomposition method for an interior inverse scattering problem. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2013, 7 (1) : 291-303. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2013.7.291 [17] Behrouz Kheirfam. A weighted-path-following method for symmetric cone linear complementarity problems. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2014, 4 (2) : 141-150. doi: 10.3934/naco.2014.4.141 [18] Wei-Zhe Gu, Li-Yong Lu. The linear convergence of a derivative-free descent method for nonlinear complementarity problems. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (2) : 531-548. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016030 [19] Lunji Song, Zhimin Zhang. Polynomial preserving recovery of an over-penalized symmetric interior penalty Galerkin method for elliptic problems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2015, 20 (5) : 1405-1426. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2015.20.1405 [20] Boshi Tian, Xiaoqi Yang, Kaiwen Meng. An interior-point $l_{\frac{1}{2}}$-penalty method for inequality constrained nonlinear optimization. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2016, 12 (3) : 949-973. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016.12.949

2018 Impact Factor: 1.025