# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

• Previous Article
Gap functions and Hausdorff continuity of solution mappings to parametric strong vector quasiequilibrium problems
• JIMO Home
• This Issue
• Next Article
Advertising games on national brand and store brand in a dual-channel supply chain
January  2018, 14(1): 81-103. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017038

## Modeling and computation of water management by real options

 1 Coordinated Innovation Center for Computable Modeling in Management Science, Tianjin University of Finance and Economics, Tianjin, 300222, China 2 School of Mathematics and Statistics, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China

* Corresponding author: Shuhua Zhang

Received  April 2016 Revised  February 2017 Published  April 2017

Fund Project: This project was supported in part by the National Basic Research Program (2012CB955804), the Major Research Plan of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (91430108), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11171251), and the Major Program of Tianjin University of Finance and Economics (ZD1302)

It becomes increasingly important to manage water and improve the efficiency of irrigation under higher temperatures and irregular precipitation patterns. The choice of investment in water saving technologies and its timing play key roles in improving efficiency of water use. In this paper, we use a real option approach to establish a model to handle future uncertainties about the water price. In addition, to match the practical situation, the expiration of the real option is considered to be finite in our model, such that it is difficult to solve the model. Therefore, we reformulate the problem into a linear parabolic variational inequality (Ⅵ) and develop a power penalty method to solve it numerically. Thus, a nonlinear partial differential equation (PDE) is obtained, which is shown to be uniquely solvable and the solution of the nonlinear PDE converges to that of the Ⅵ at the rate of $O(λ^{-\frac{k}{2}})$ with $λ$ being the penalty number. Furthermore, a so-called fitted finite volume method is proposed to solve the nonlinear PDE. Finally, several numerical experiments are performed. It is shown that the subjective discount rate will affect the investment boundary mostly, and the flexibility to suspend operation will enlarge the investment region.

Citation: Shuhua Zhang, Xinyu Wang, Hua Li. Modeling and computation of water management by real options. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2018, 14 (1) : 81-103. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017038
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
European real option values for Test 1
American real option values for Test 2
The Δ and the optimal exercise boundary for Test 2
Comparative statics for the main parameters for Test 2
Real option values for Test 3
The ∆ and the optimal exercise boundary for Test 3
The effect of the suspending operation on investment boundary for Test 3
Trigger prices under different levels of subsidy in four time points
Computed errors in the $L^{\infty}$-norm at $t = 0$
 mesh $L^{\infty}$-norm ratio mesh $L^{\infty}$-norm ratio} $2^5\times2^4$ 197.4574 $2^{10}\times2^9$ 0.4418 1.9276 $2^6\times2^5$ 55.1497 3.5804 $2^{11}\times2^{10}$ 0.0453 9.7528 $2^7\times2^6$ 28.7732 1.9176 $2^{12}\times2^{11}$ 0.0124 3.6532 $2^8\times2^7$ 2.9357 9.8012 $2^{13}\times2^{12}$ 0.0054 2.2963 $2^9\times2^8$ 0.8512 3.4489
 mesh $L^{\infty}$-norm ratio mesh $L^{\infty}$-norm ratio} $2^5\times2^4$ 197.4574 $2^{10}\times2^9$ 0.4418 1.9276 $2^6\times2^5$ 55.1497 3.5804 $2^{11}\times2^{10}$ 0.0453 9.7528 $2^7\times2^6$ 28.7732 1.9176 $2^{12}\times2^{11}$ 0.0124 3.6532 $2^8\times2^7$ 2.9357 9.8012 $2^{13}\times2^{12}$ 0.0054 2.2963 $2^9\times2^8$ 0.8512 3.4489
 [1] Nan Li, Song Wang, Shuhua Zhang. Pricing options on investment project contraction and ownership transfer using a finite volume scheme and an interior penalty method. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (5) : 1-20. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019006 [2] Ming Chen, Chongchao Huang. A power penalty method for the general traffic assignment problem with elastic demand. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2014, 10 (4) : 1019-1030. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2014.10.1019 [3] Ming Chen, Chongchao Huang. A power penalty method for a class of linearly constrained variational inequality. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2018, 14 (4) : 1381-1396. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018012 [4] Xiaojiao Tong, Felix F. Wu, Yongping Zhang, Zheng Yan, Yixin Ni. A semismooth Newton method for solving optimal power flow. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2007, 3 (3) : 553-567. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2007.3.553 [5] Kai Zhang, Kok Lay Teo. A penalty-based method from reconstructing smooth local volatility surface from American options. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2015, 11 (2) : 631-644. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2015.11.631 [6] Caterina Calgaro, Meriem Ezzoug, Ezzeddine Zahrouni. Stability and convergence of an hybrid finite volume-finite element method for a multiphasic incompressible fluid model. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2018, 17 (2) : 429-448. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2018024 [7] Christos V. Nikolopoulos, Georgios E. Zouraris. Numerical solution of a non-local elliptic problem modeling a thermistor with a finite element and a finite volume method. Conference Publications, 2007, 2007 (Special) : 768-778. doi: 10.3934/proc.2007.2007.768 [8] Wen Chen, Song Wang. A finite difference method for pricing European and American options under a geometric Lévy process. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2015, 11 (1) : 241-264. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2015.11.241 [9] Nora Aïssiouene, Marie-Odile Bristeau, Edwige Godlewski, Jacques Sainte-Marie. A combined finite volume - finite element scheme for a dispersive shallow water system. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2016, 11 (1) : 1-27. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2016.11.1 [10] Stefan Berres, Ricardo Ruiz-Baier, Hartmut Schwandt, Elmer M. Tory. An adaptive finite-volume method for a model of two-phase pedestrian flow. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2011, 6 (3) : 401-423. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2011.6.401 [11] Qian Zhao, Zhuo Jin, Jiaqin Wei. Optimal investment and dividend payment strategies with debt management and reinsurance. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2018, 14 (4) : 1323-1348. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018009 [12] Ximin Huang, Na Song, Wai-Ki Ching, Tak-Kuen Siu, Ka-Fai Cedric Yiu. A real option approach to optimal inventory management of retail products. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2012, 8 (2) : 379-389. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2012.8.379 [13] Yanhong Yuan, Hongwei Zhang, Liwei Zhang. A penalty method for generalized Nash equilibrium problems. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2012, 8 (1) : 51-65. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2012.8.51 [14] Regina S. Burachik, C. Yalçın Kaya. An update rule and a convergence result for a penalty function method. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2007, 3 (2) : 381-398. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2007.3.381 [15] Zhongwen Chen, Songqiang Qiu, Yujie Jiao. A penalty-free method for equality constrained optimization. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2013, 9 (2) : 391-409. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2013.9.391 [16] Wenjuan Zhai, Bingzhen Chen. A fourth order implicit symmetric and symplectic exponentially fitted Runge-Kutta-Nyström method for solving oscillatory problems. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2019, 9 (1) : 71-84. doi: 10.3934/naco.2019006 [17] Wen Li, Song Wang. Pricing American options under proportional transaction costs using a penalty approach and a finite difference scheme. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2013, 9 (2) : 365-389. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2013.9.365 [18] Cheng Ma, Xun Li, Ka-Fai Cedric Yiu, Yongjian Yang, Liansheng Zhang. On an exact penalty function method for semi-infinite programming problems. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2012, 8 (3) : 705-726. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2012.8.705 [19] Ming-Zheng Wang, M. Montaz Ali. Penalty-based SAA method of stochastic nonlinear complementarity problems. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2010, 6 (1) : 241-257. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2010.6.241 [20] Changjun Yu, Kok Lay Teo, Liansheng Zhang, Yanqin Bai. A new exact penalty function method for continuous inequality constrained optimization problems. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2010, 6 (4) : 895-910. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2010.6.895

2018 Impact Factor: 1.025

## Tools

Article outline

Figures and Tables