# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

June  2016, 8(2): 169-178. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2016002

## Poisson and integrable systems through the Nambu bracket and its Jacobi multiplier

 1 Departamento de Matemática, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad del Bío-Bío, Casilla 5-C. Concepción, Chile 2 Departamento de Matemática Aplicada, Universidad de Murcia, 30071 Espinardo, Spain

Received  August 2015 Revised  January 2016 Published  June 2016

Poisson and integrable systems are orbitally equivalent through the Nambu bracket. Namely, we show that every completely integrable system of differential equations may be expressed into the Poisson-Hamiltonian formalism by means of the Nambu-Hamilton equations of motion and a reparametrisation related by the Jacobian multiplier. The equations of motion provide a natural way for finding the Jacobian multiplier. As a consequence, we partially give an alternative proof of a recent theorem in [13]. We complete this work presenting some features associated to Hamiltonian maximally superintegrable systems.
Citation: Francisco Crespo, Francisco Javier Molero, Sebastián Ferrer. Poisson and integrable systems through the Nambu bracket and its Jacobi multiplier. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2016, 8 (2) : 169-178. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2016002
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
 [1] Sobhan Seyfaddini. Spectral killers and Poisson bracket invariants. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2015, 9: 51-66. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2015.9.51 [2] Frol Zapolsky. Quasi-states and the Poisson bracket on surfaces. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2007, 1 (3) : 465-475. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2007.1.465 [3] Karina Samvelyan, Frol Zapolsky. Rigidity of the ${{L}^{p}}$-norm of the Poisson bracket on surfaces. Electronic Research Announcements, 2017, 24: 28-37. doi: 10.3934/era.2017.24.004 [4] Răzvan M. Tudoran. On the control of stability of periodic orbits of completely integrable systems. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2015, 7 (1) : 109-124. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2015.7.109 [5] Roberto Camassa. Characteristics and the initial value problem of a completely integrable shallow water equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2003, 3 (1) : 115-139. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2003.3.115 [6] Vladimir Dragović, Milena Radnović. Pseudo-integrable billiards and arithmetic dynamics. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2014, 8 (1) : 109-132. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2014.8.109 [7] Eugenii Shustin. Dynamics of oscillations in a multi-dimensional delay differential system. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2004, 11 (2&3) : 557-576. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2004.11.557 [8] Dmitry Treschev. A locally integrable multi-dimensional billiard system. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2017, 37 (10) : 5271-5284. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017228 [9] Jihua Yang, Liqin Zhao. Limit cycle bifurcations for piecewise smooth integrable differential systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2017, 22 (6) : 2417-2425. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2017123 [10] Rongmei Cao, Jiangong You. The existence of integrable invariant manifolds of Hamiltonian partial differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2006, 16 (1) : 227-234. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.16.227 [11] Octavian G. Mustafa, Yuri V. Rogovchenko. Existence of square integrable solutions of perturbed nonlinear differential equations. Conference Publications, 2003, 2003 (Special) : 647-655. doi: 10.3934/proc.2003.2003.647 [12] Urszula Foryś, Jan Poleszczuk. A delay-differential equation model of HIV related cancer--immune system dynamics. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2011, 8 (2) : 627-641. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2011.8.627 [13] Bernard Dacorogna, Olivier Kneuss. Multiple Jacobian equations. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2014, 13 (5) : 1779-1787. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2014.13.1779 [14] Isabelle Déchène. On the security of generalized Jacobian cryptosystems. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2007, 1 (4) : 413-426. doi: 10.3934/amc.2007.1.413 [15] Irene M. Gamba, Maria Pia Gualdani, Christof Sparber. A note on the time decay of solutions for the linearized Wigner-Poisson system. Kinetic & Related Models, 2009, 2 (1) : 181-189. doi: 10.3934/krm.2009.2.181 [16] Robert T. Glassey, Walter A. Strauss. Perturbation of essential spectra of evolution operators and the Vlasov-Poisson-Boltzmann system. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 1999, 5 (3) : 457-472. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1999.5.457 [17] Xu Zhang, Shiwang Ma, Qilin Xie. Bound state solutions of Schrödinger-Poisson system with critical exponent. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2017, 37 (1) : 605-625. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017025 [18] Xueke Pu. Quasineutral limit of the Euler-Poisson system under strong magnetic fields. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2016, 9 (6) : 2095-2111. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2016086 [19] Ling Hsiao, Fucai Li, Shu Wang. Combined quasineutral and inviscid limit of the Vlasov-Poisson-Fokker-Planck system. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2008, 7 (3) : 579-589. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2008.7.579 [20] Shu Wang, Chundi Liu. Boundary Layer Problem and Quasineutral Limit of Compressible Euler-Poisson System. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2017, 16 (6) : 2177-2199. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2017108

2018 Impact Factor: 0.525