American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

• Previous Article
Analytical investigation of an integral equation method for electromagnetic scattering by biperiodic structures
• DCDS-S Home
• This Issue
• Next Article
Detection, reconstruction, and characterization algorithms from noisy data in multistatic wave imaging
June  2015, 8(3): 419-434. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2015.8.419

Radar cross section reduction of a cavity in the ground plane: TE polarization

 1 Department of Mathematics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China 2 Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University, New York, NY 10012, United States

Received  October 2013 Revised  March 2014 Published  October 2014

The reduction of backscatter radar cross section(RCS) in TE polarization for a rectangular cavity embedded in the ground plane is investigated in this paper. It is established by placing a thin, multilayered radar absorbing material(RAM) with possibly different permittivities at the bottom of the cavity. A minimization problem with respect to the backscatter RCS is formulated to determine the synthesis of RAM. The underlying scattered field is governed by a generalized Helmholtz equation with transparent boundary condition. The gradient with respect to the material permittivity is derived by the adjoint state method. A fast solver for the Helmholtz equation is presented for the optimization scheme. Numerical examples are presented to show the efficiency of the algorithm for RCS reduction.
Citation: Gang Bao, Jun Lai. Radar cross section reduction of a cavity in the ground plane: TE polarization. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2015, 8 (3) : 419-434. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2015.8.419
References:

show all references

References:
 [1] Faustino Maestre, Pablo Pedregal. Dynamic materials for an optimal design problem under the two-dimensional wave equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2009, 23 (3) : 973-990. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.23.973 [2] Claude Vallée, Camelia Lerintiu, Danielle Fortuné, Kossi Atchonouglo, Jamal Chaoufi. Modelling of implicit standard materials. Application to linear coaxial non-associated constitutive laws. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2013, 6 (6) : 1641-1649. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2013.6.1641 [3] Luca Deseri, Massiliano Zingales, Pietro Pollaci. The state of fractional hereditary materials (FHM). Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2014, 19 (7) : 2065-2089. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2014.19.2065 [4] Pablo Pedregal. Fully explicit quasiconvexification of the mean-square deviation of the gradient of the state in optimal design. Electronic Research Announcements, 2001, 7: 72-78. [5] Canghua Jiang, Zhiqiang Guo, Xin Li, Hai Wang, Ming Yu. An efficient adjoint computational method based on lifted IRK integrator and exact penalty function for optimal control problems involving continuous inequality constraints. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2018, 0 (0) : 0-0. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020109 [6] Matthias Gerdts, Martin Kunkel. A nonsmooth Newton's method for discretized optimal control problems with state and control constraints. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2008, 4 (2) : 247-270. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2008.4.247 [7] Qiang Yin, Gongfa Li, Jianguo Zhu. Research on the method of step feature extraction for EOD robot based on 2D laser radar. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2015, 8 (6) : 1415-1421. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2015.8.1415 [8] H. T. Banks, R. A. Everett, Neha Murad, R. D. White, J. E. Banks, Bodil N. Cass, Jay A. Rosenheim. Optimal design for dynamical modeling of pest populations. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2018, 15 (4) : 993-1010. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2018044 [9] K.F.C. Yiu, K.L. Mak, K. L. Teo. Airfoil design via optimal control theory. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2005, 1 (1) : 133-148. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2005.1.133 [10] Boris P. Belinskiy. Optimal design of an optical length of a rod with the given mass. Conference Publications, 2007, 2007 (Special) : 85-91. doi: 10.3934/proc.2007.2007.85 [11] Yannick Privat, Emmanuel Trélat. Optimal design of sensors for a damped wave equation. Conference Publications, 2015, 2015 (special) : 936-944. doi: 10.3934/proc.2015.0936 [12] Wei Xu, Liying Yu, Gui-Hua Lin, Zhi Guo Feng. Optimal switching signal design with a cost on switching action. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (5) : 1-19. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019068 [13] Zhigang Ren, Shan Guo, Zhipeng Li, Zongze Wu. Adjoint-based parameter and state estimation in 1-D magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) flow system. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2018, 14 (4) : 1579-1594. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018022 [14] Kaili Zhang, Haibin Chen, Pengfei Zhao. A potential reduction method for tensor complementarity problems. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2019, 15 (2) : 429-443. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018049 [15] Heinz Schättler, Urszula Ledzewicz. Lyapunov-Schmidt reduction for optimal control problems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2012, 17 (6) : 2201-2223. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2012.17.2201 [16] Huaying Guo, Jin Liang. An optimal control model of carbon reduction and trading. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2016, 6 (4) : 535-550. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2016015 [17] Bin Li, Kok Lay Teo, Cheng-Chew Lim, Guang Ren Duan. An optimal PID controller design for nonlinear constrained optimal control problems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2011, 16 (4) : 1101-1117. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2011.16.1101 [18] Dinh Cong Huong, Mai Viet Thuan. State transformations of time-varying delay systems and their applications to state observer design. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2017, 10 (3) : 413-444. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2017020 [19] Patrick De Kepper, István Szalai. An effective design method to produce stationary chemical reaction-diffusion patterns. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2012, 11 (1) : 189-207. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2012.11.189 [20] Igor Shevchenko, Barbara Kaltenbacher. Absorbing boundary conditions for the Westervelt equation. Conference Publications, 2015, 2015 (special) : 1000-1008. doi: 10.3934/proc.2015.1000

2018 Impact Factor: 0.545