# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

January  2008, 9(1): 103-128. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2008.9.103

## Modeling group dynamics of phototaxis: From particle systems to PDEs

 1 Department of Mathematics and Center for Scientific Computation and Mathematical Modeling, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, United States 2 Department of Mathematics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-2125, United States

Received  April 2007 Revised  August 2007 Published  October 2007

This work presents a hierarchy of mathematical models for describing the motion of phototactic bacteria, i.e., bacteria that move towards light. Based on experimental observations, we conjecture that the motion of the colony towards light depends on certain group dynamics. This group dynamics is assumed to be encoded as an individual property of each bacterium, which we refer to as ’excitation’. The excitation of each individual bacterium changes based on the excitation of the neighboring bacteria. Under these assumptions, we derive a stochastic model for describing the evolution in time of the location of bacteria, the excitation of individual bacteria, and a surface memory effect. A discretization of this model results in an interacting stochastic many-particle system. The third, and last model is a system of partial differential equations that is obtained as the continuum limit of the stochastic particle system. The main theoretical results establish the validity of the new system of PDEs as the limit dynamics of the multi-particle system.
Citation: Doron Levy, Tiago Requeijo. Modeling group dynamics of phototaxis: From particle systems to PDEs. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2008, 9 (1) : 103-128. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2008.9.103
 [1] Seung-Yeal Ha, Doron Levy. Particle, kinetic and fluid models for phototaxis. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2009, 12 (1) : 77-108. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2009.12.77 [2] Nicolas Forcadel, Cyril Imbert, Régis Monneau. Homogenization of some particle systems with two-body interactions and of the dislocation dynamics. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2009, 23 (3) : 785-826. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.23.785 [3] Nathan Glatt-Holtz, Mohammed Ziane. Singular perturbation systems with stochastic forcing and the renormalization group method. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2010, 26 (4) : 1241-1268. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.26.1241 [4] P. Adda, J. L. Dimi, A. Iggidir, J. C. Kamgang, G. Sallet, J. J. Tewa. General models of host-parasite systems. Global analysis. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2007, 8 (1) : 1-17. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2007.8.1 [5] MirosŁaw Lachowicz, Tatiana Ryabukha. Equilibrium solutions for microscopic stochastic systems in population dynamics. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2013, 10 (3) : 777-786. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.777 [6] David Cowan. Rigid particle systems and their billiard models. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2008, 22 (1&2) : 111-130. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2008.22.111 [7] Felix X.-F. Ye, Hong Qian. Stochastic dynamics Ⅱ: Finite random dynamical systems, linear representation, and entropy production. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (8) : 4341-4366. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019122 [8] Pierre Degond, Simone Goettlich, Axel Klar, Mohammed Seaid, Andreas Unterreiter. Derivation of a kinetic model from a stochastic particle system. Kinetic & Related Models, 2008, 1 (4) : 557-572. doi: 10.3934/krm.2008.1.557 [9] Denis de Carvalho Braga, Luis Fernando Mello, Carmen Rocşoreanu, Mihaela Sterpu. Lyapunov coefficients for non-symmetrically coupled identical dynamical systems. Application to coupled advertising models. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2009, 11 (3) : 785-803. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2009.11.785 [10] Susanna Terracini, Juncheng Wei. DCDS-A Special Volume Qualitative properties of solutions of nonlinear elliptic equations and systems. Preface. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2014, 34 (6) : i-ii. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.6i [11] Anna Kostianko, Sergey Zelik. Inertial manifolds for 1D reaction-diffusion-advection systems. Part Ⅰ: Dirichlet and Neumann boundary conditions. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2017, 16 (6) : 2357-2376. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2017116 [12] Anna Kostianko, Sergey Zelik. Inertial manifolds for 1D reaction-diffusion-advection systems. Part Ⅱ: periodic boundary conditions. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2018, 17 (1) : 285-317. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2018017 [13] Eliot Fried. New insights into the classical mechanics of particle systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2010, 28 (4) : 1469-1504. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.28.1469 [14] Monica Marras, Stella Vernier-Piro, Giuseppe Viglialoro. Decay in chemotaxis systems with a logistic term. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2018, 0 (0) : 257-268. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020014 [15] Jeffrey J. Early, Juha Pohjanpelto, Roger M. Samelson. Group foliation of equations in geophysical fluid dynamics. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2010, 27 (4) : 1571-1586. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.27.1571 [16] Mahesh Nerurkar. Forced linear oscillators and the dynamics of Euclidean group extensions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2016, 9 (4) : 1201-1234. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2016049 [17] Michele Gianfelice, Marco Isopi. On the location of the 1-particle branch of the spectrum of the disordered stochastic Ising model. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2011, 6 (1) : 127-144. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2011.6.127 [18] Lee DeVille, Nicole Riemer, Matthew West. Convergence of a generalized Weighted Flow Algorithm for stochastic particle coagulation. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2019, 6 (1) : 69-94. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2019003 [19] Tomomi Yokota, Noriaki Yoshino. Existence of solutions to chemotaxis dynamics with logistic source. Conference Publications, 2015, 2015 (special) : 1125-1133. doi: 10.3934/proc.2015.1125 [20] Yuezheng Gong, Jiaquan Gao, Yushun Wang. High order Gauss-Seidel schemes for charged particle dynamics. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2018, 23 (2) : 573-585. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018034

2018 Impact Factor: 1.008