# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

• Previous Article
On the 2-D Riemann problem for the compressible Euler equations II. Interaction of contact discontinuities
• DCDS Home
• This Issue
• Next Article
Absolutely continuous invariant measures for piecewise $C^2$ and expanding mappings in higher dimensions
April  2000, 6(2): 431-450. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2000.6.431

## Second order sufficient optimality conditions for nonlinear parabolic control problems with state constraints

 1 Laboratoire MIP, UMR 5640, Université Paul Sabatier, 31062 Toulouse Cedex 4 2 Technische Universität Chemnitz, Fakultät für Mathematik, D-09107 Chemnitz, Germany

Received  July 1998 Revised  June 1999 Published  January 2000

In this paper, optimal control problems for semilinear parabolic equations with distributed and boundary controls are considered. Pointwise constraints on the control and on the state are given. Main emphasis is laid on the discussion of second order sufficient optimality conditions. Sufficiency for local optimality is verified under different assumptions imposed on the dimension of the domain and on the smoothness of the given data.
Citation: J.-P. Raymond, F. Tröltzsch. Second order sufficient optimality conditions for nonlinear parabolic control problems with state constraints. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2000, 6 (2) : 431-450. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2000.6.431
 [1] J.-P. Raymond. Nonlinear boundary control of semilinear parabolic problems with pointwise state constraints. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 1997, 3 (3) : 341-370. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1997.3.341 [2] Lihua Li, Yan Gao, Hongjie Wang. Second order sufficient optimality conditions for hybrid control problems with state jump. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2015, 11 (1) : 329-343. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2015.11.329 [3] Miniak-Górecka Alicja, Nowakowski Andrzej. Sufficient optimality conditions for a class of epidemic problems with control on the boundary. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2017, 14 (1) : 263-275. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2017017 [4] Heinz Schättler, Urszula Ledzewicz, Helmut Maurer. Sufficient conditions for strong local optimality in optimal control problems with $L_{2}$-type objectives and control constraints. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2014, 19 (8) : 2657-2679. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2014.19.2657 [5] Lucas Bonifacius, Ira Neitzel. Second order optimality conditions for optimal control of quasilinear parabolic equations. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2018, 8 (1) : 1-34. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2018001 [6] Ana P. Lemos-Paião, Cristiana J. Silva, Delfim F. M. Torres. A sufficient optimality condition for delayed state-linear optimal control problems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (5) : 2293-2313. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019096 [7] Shu Luan. On the existence of optimal control for semilinear elliptic equations with nonlinear neumann boundary conditions. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2017, 7 (3) : 493-506. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2017018 [8] M. Soledad Aronna. Second order necessary and sufficient optimality conditions for singular solutions of partially-affine control problems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2018, 11 (6) : 1233-1258. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2018070 [9] Vincenzo Basco, Piermarco Cannarsa, Hélène Frankowska. Necessary conditions for infinite horizon optimal control problems with state constraints. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2018, 8 (3&4) : 535-555. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2018022 [10] Stepan Sorokin, Maxim Staritsyn. Feedback necessary optimality conditions for a class of terminally constrained state-linear variational problems inspired by impulsive control. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2017, 7 (2) : 201-210. doi: 10.3934/naco.2017014 [11] Jiongmin Yong. Optimality conditions for controls of semilinear evolution systems with mixed constraints. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 1995, 1 (3) : 371-388. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1995.1.371 [12] Shahlar F. Maharramov. Necessary optimality conditions for switching control problems. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2010, 6 (1) : 47-55. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2010.6.47 [13] Samuel Bernard, Jacques Bélair, Michael C Mackey. Sufficient conditions for stability of linear differential equations with distributed delay. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2001, 1 (2) : 233-256. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2001.1.233 [14] Ciro D'Apice, Olha P. Kupenko, Rosanna Manzo. On boundary optimal control problem for an arterial system: First-order optimality conditions. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2018, 13 (4) : 585-607. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2018027 [15] Sébastien Court, Karl Kunisch, Laurent Pfeiffer. Hybrid optimal control problems for a class of semilinear parabolic equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2018, 11 (6) : 1031-1060. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2018060 [16] M. Arisawa, P.-L. Lions. Continuity of admissible trajectories for state constraints control problems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 1996, 2 (3) : 297-305. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1996.2.297 [17] Mikhail Gusev. On reachability analysis for nonlinear control systems with state constraints. Conference Publications, 2015, 2015 (special) : 579-587. doi: 10.3934/proc.2015.0579 [18] Volodymyr O. Kapustyan, Ivan O. Pyshnograiev, Olena A. Kapustian. Quasi-optimal control with a general quadratic criterion in a special norm for systems described by parabolic-hyperbolic equations with non-local boundary conditions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (3) : 1243-1258. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019014 [19] Huaiqiang Yu, Bin Liu. Pontryagin's principle for local solutions of optimal control governed by the 2D Navier-Stokes equations with mixed control-state constraints. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2012, 2 (1) : 61-80. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2012.2.61 [20] Sofia O. Lopes, Fernando A. C. C. Fontes, Maria do Rosário de Pinho. On constraint qualifications for nondegenerate necessary conditions of optimality applied to optimal control problems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2011, 29 (2) : 559-575. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.29.559

2018 Impact Factor: 1.143