# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

January  2000, 6(1): 21-38. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2000.6.21

## BV estimates for multicomponent chromatography with relaxation

 1 S.I.S.S.A., Via Beirut, 2-4, 34014 Trieste 2 S.I.S.S.A., Via Beirut 4, Trieste 34014, Italy

Received  October 1999 Published  December 1999

We consider the Cauchy problem for a system of $2n$ balance laws which arises from the modelling of multi-component chromatography:

$u_t + u_x =-\frac{1}{\varepsilon} (F(u)-v),$    (1)

$v_t = \frac{1}{\varepsilon} (F(u)-v),$

This model describes a liquid flowing with unit speed over a solid bed. Several chemical substances are partly dissolved in the liquid, partly deposited on the solid bed. Their concentrations are represented respectively by the vectors $u = (u_1, ... , u_n)$ and $v = (v_1, ... , v_n)$.
We show that, if the initial data have small total variation, then the solution of (1) remains with small variation for all times $t \geq 0$. Moreover, using the $mathbf L^1$ distance, this solution depends Lipschitz continuously on the initial data, with a Lipschitz constant uniform w.r.t. $\varepsilon$. Finally we prove that as $\varepsilon\to 0$, the solutions of (1) converge to a limit described by the system

$(u + F(u))_t + u_x = 0,$    $v= F(u)$.   (2)

The proof of the uniform BV estimates relies on the application of probabilistic techniques. It is shown that the components of the gradients $v_x$, $u_x$ can be interpreted as densities of random particles travelling with speed $0$ or $1$. The amount of coupling between different components is estimated in terms of the expected number of crossing of these random particles. This provides a first example where BV estimates are proved for general solutions to a class of $2n \times 2n$ systems with relaxation.

Citation: Alberto Bressan, Wen Shen. BV estimates for multicomponent chromatography with relaxation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2000, 6 (1) : 21-38. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2000.6.21
 [1] Constantine M. Dafermos. Hyperbolic balance laws with relaxation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2016, 36 (8) : 4271-4285. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2016.36.4271 [2] Zhi-Qiang Shao. Lifespan of classical discontinuous solutions to the generalized nonlinear initial-boundary Riemann problem for hyperbolic conservation laws with small BV data: shocks and contact discontinuities. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2015, 14 (3) : 759-792. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2015.14.759 [3] Tai-Ping Liu, Shih-Hsien Yu. Hyperbolic conservation laws and dynamic systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2000, 6 (1) : 143-145. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2000.6.143 [4] Alberto Bressan, Marta Lewicka. A uniqueness condition for hyperbolic systems of conservation laws. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2000, 6 (3) : 673-682. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2000.6.673 [5] Gui-Qiang Chen, Monica Torres. On the structure of solutions of nonlinear hyperbolic systems of conservation laws. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2011, 10 (4) : 1011-1036. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2011.10.1011 [6] Stefano Bianchini. A note on singular limits to hyperbolic systems of conservation laws. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2003, 2 (1) : 51-64. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2003.2.51 [7] Xavier Litrico, Vincent Fromion, Gérard Scorletti. Robust feedforward boundary control of hyperbolic conservation laws. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2007, 2 (4) : 717-731. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2007.2.717 [8] Constantine M. Dafermos. A variational approach to the Riemann problem for hyperbolic conservation laws. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2009, 23 (1&2) : 185-195. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.23.185 [9] Fumioki Asakura, Andrea Corli. The path decomposition technique for systems of hyperbolic conservation laws. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2016, 9 (1) : 15-32. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2016.9.15 [10] Shijin Deng, Weike Wang. Pointwise estimates of solutions for the multi-dimensional scalar conservation laws with relaxation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2011, 30 (4) : 1107-1138. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.30.1107 [11] Mapundi K. Banda, Michael Herty. Numerical discretization of stabilization problems with boundary controls for systems of hyperbolic conservation laws. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2013, 3 (2) : 121-142. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2013.3.121 [12] Eitan Tadmor. Perfect derivatives, conservative differences and entropy stable computation of hyperbolic conservation laws. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2016, 36 (8) : 4579-4598. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2016.36.4579 [13] Stefano Bianchini. On the shift differentiability of the flow generated by a hyperbolic system of conservation laws. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2000, 6 (2) : 329-350. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2000.6.329 [14] Tatsien Li, Libin Wang. Global exact shock reconstruction for quasilinear hyperbolic systems of conservation laws. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2006, 15 (2) : 597-609. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.15.597 [15] Boris Andreianov, Mohamed Karimou Gazibo. Explicit formulation for the Dirichlet problem for parabolic-hyperbolic conservation laws. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2016, 11 (2) : 203-222. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2016.11.203 [16] Yu Zhang, Yanyan Zhang. Riemann problems for a class of coupled hyperbolic systems of conservation laws with a source term. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2019, 18 (3) : 1523-1545. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2019073 [17] Avner Friedman. Conservation laws in mathematical biology. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2012, 32 (9) : 3081-3097. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2012.32.3081 [18] Mauro Garavello. A review of conservation laws on networks. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2010, 5 (3) : 565-581. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2010.5.565 [19] Mauro Garavello, Roberto Natalini, Benedetto Piccoli, Andrea Terracina. Conservation laws with discontinuous flux. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2007, 2 (1) : 159-179. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2007.2.159 [20] Len G. Margolin, Roy S. Baty. Conservation laws in discrete geometry. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2019, 11 (2) : 187-203. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2019010

2018 Impact Factor: 1.143