# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

November  2012, 6(4): 385-400. doi: 10.3934/amc.2012.6.385

## Decoding affine reflection group codes with trellises

 1 Communication Systems Group, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64283 Darmstadt, Germany 2 Department of Computer Science, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, Canada 3 Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada

Received  April 2011 Revised  June 2012 Published  November 2012

We present two decoding methods (called hybrid and lattice cosets) for affine reflection group codes (ARGC) of any dimension. The algorithms are based on viewing the affine reflection group as a semi-direct product of a crystallographic finite reflection group and its coroot lattice. The proposed lattice cosets method gives an explicit method for drawing a trellis diagram representation of ARGC. The complexities of these two decoding methods, as well as the trade-offs between them, are discussed.
Citation: Terasan Niyomsataya, Ali Miri, Monica Nevins. Decoding affine reflection group codes with trellises. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2012, 6 (4) : 385-400. doi: 10.3934/amc.2012.6.385
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
 [1] Kanat Abdukhalikov. On codes over rings invariant under affine groups. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2013, 7 (3) : 253-265. doi: 10.3934/amc.2013.7.253 [2] Kwankyu Lee. Decoding of differential AG codes. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2016, 10 (2) : 307-319. doi: 10.3934/amc.2016007 [3] Elisa Gorla, Felice Manganiello, Joachim Rosenthal. An algebraic approach for decoding spread codes. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2012, 6 (4) : 443-466. doi: 10.3934/amc.2012.6.443 [4] Washiela Fish, Jennifer D. Key, Eric Mwambene. Partial permutation decoding for simplex codes. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2012, 6 (4) : 505-516. doi: 10.3934/amc.2012.6.505 [5] Alexander Barg, Arya Mazumdar, Gilles Zémor. Weight distribution and decoding of codes on hypergraphs. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2008, 2 (4) : 433-450. doi: 10.3934/amc.2008.2.433 [6] Sergio Estrada, J. R. García-Rozas, Justo Peralta, E. Sánchez-García. Group convolutional codes. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2008, 2 (1) : 83-94. doi: 10.3934/amc.2008.2.83 [7] Heide Gluesing-Luerssen, Uwe Helmke, José Ignacio Iglesias Curto. Algebraic decoding for doubly cyclic convolutional codes. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2010, 4 (1) : 83-99. doi: 10.3934/amc.2010.4.83 [8] Fernando Hernando, Tom Høholdt, Diego Ruano. List decoding of matrix-product codes from nested codes: An application to quasi-cyclic codes. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2012, 6 (3) : 259-272. doi: 10.3934/amc.2012.6.259 [9] Joan-Josep Climent, Diego Napp, Raquel Pinto, Rita Simões. Decoding of $2$D convolutional codes over an erasure channel. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2016, 10 (1) : 179-193. doi: 10.3934/amc.2016.10.179 [10] Johan Rosenkilde. Power decoding Reed-Solomon codes up to the Johnson radius. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2018, 12 (1) : 81-106. doi: 10.3934/amc.2018005 [11] Irene I. Bouw, Sabine Kampf. Syndrome decoding for Hermite codes with a Sugiyama-type algorithm. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2012, 6 (4) : 419-442. doi: 10.3934/amc.2012.6.419 [12] Anas Chaaban, Vladimir Sidorenko, Christian Senger. On multi-trial Forney-Kovalev decoding of concatenated codes. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2014, 8 (1) : 1-20. doi: 10.3934/amc.2014.8.1 [13] Vladimir Sidorenko, Christian Senger, Martin Bossert, Victor Zyablov. Single-trial decoding of concatenated codes using fixed or adaptive erasing. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2010, 4 (1) : 49-60. doi: 10.3934/amc.2010.4.49 [14] Peter Beelen, Kristian Brander. Efficient list decoding of a class of algebraic-geometry codes. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2010, 4 (4) : 485-518. doi: 10.3934/amc.2010.4.485 [15] Alexey Frolov, Victor Zyablov. On the multiple threshold decoding of LDPC codes over GF(q). Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2017, 11 (1) : 123-137. doi: 10.3934/amc.2017007 [16] Steven T. Dougherty, Cristina Fernández-Córdoba, Roger Ten-Valls, Bahattin Yildiz. Quaternary group ring codes: Ranks, kernels and self-dual codes. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2019, 0 (0) : 0-0. doi: 10.3934/amc.2020023 [17] Hannes Bartz, Antonia Wachter-Zeh. Efficient decoding of interleaved subspace and Gabidulin codes beyond their unique decoding radius using Gröbner bases. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2018, 12 (4) : 773-804. doi: 10.3934/amc.2018046 [18] Jamshid Moori, Amin Saeidi. Some designs and codes invariant under the Tits group. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2017, 11 (1) : 77-82. doi: 10.3934/amc.2017003 [19] Cristina García Pillado, Santos González, Victor Markov, Consuelo Martínez, Alexandr Nechaev. New examples of non-abelian group codes. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2016, 10 (1) : 1-10. doi: 10.3934/amc.2016.10.1 [20] Cristóbal Camarero, Carmen Martínez, Ramón Beivide. Identifying codes of degree 4 Cayley graphs over Abelian groups. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2015, 9 (2) : 129-148. doi: 10.3934/amc.2015.9.129

2018 Impact Factor: 0.879