Closedform solutions for the LucasUzawa growth model
with logarithmic utility preferences via the partial Hamiltonian
approach
Pages: 643  654,
Issue 4,
August
2018
doi:10.3934/dcdss.2018039 Abstract
References
Full text (328.5K)
Related Articles
Azam Chaudhry  Department of Economics, Lahore School of Economics, Lahore, 53200, Pakistan (email)
Rehana Naz  Department of Mathematics and Statistical Sciences, Lahore School of Economics, Lahore, 53200, Pakistan (email)
1 
K. J. Arrow, Applications of Control Theory to Economic Growth, in Veinott, A. F., & Dantzig, G. B. (Eds.) Mathematics of the decision sciences, Part 2, American Mathematical scociety 11, 1968. 

2 
J. Benhabib and R. Perli, Uniqueness and indeterminacy: On the dynamics of endogenous growth, Journal of Economic Theory, 63 (1994), 113142. 

3 
D. Bethmann, Solving macroeconomic models with homogeneous technology and logarithmic preferences, Australian Economic Papers, 52 (2013), 118. 

4 
R. Boucekkine and J. R. RuizTamarit, Special functions for the study of economic dynamics: The case of the LucasUzawa model, Journal of Mathematical Economics, 44 (2008), 3354. 

5 
J. CaballĂ© and M. S. Santos, On endogenous growth with physical and human capital, Journal of Political Economy, (1993), 10421067. 

6 
A. Chaudhry, H. Tanveer and R. Naz, Unique and multiple equilibria in a macroeconomic model with environmental quality: An analysis of local stability, Economic Modelling, 63 (2017), 206214. 

7 
C. Chilarescu, On the existence and uniqueness of solution to the LucasUzawa model, Economic Modelling, 28 (2011), 109117. 

8 
C. Chilarescu, An analytical solutions for a model of endogenous growth, Economic Modelling, 25 (2008), 11751182. 

9 
C. Chilarescu and C. Sipos, Solving macroeconomic models with homogenous technology and logarithmic preferencesA note, Economics Bulletin, 34 (2014), 541550. 

10 
R. Lucas, On the mechanics of economic development, Journal of Monetary Economics, 22 (1988), 342. 

11 
O. L. Mangasarian, Sufficient conditions for the optimal control of nonlinear systems, SIAM Journal on Control, 4 (1966), 139152. 

12 
C. B. Mulligan and X. SalaiMartin, Transitional dynamics in twosector models of endogenous growth, The Quaterly Journal of Economics, 108 (1993), 739773. 

13 
R. Naz, F. M. Mahomed and A. Chaudhry, A Partial Hamiltonian Approach for Current Value Hamiltonian Systems, Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 19 (2014), 36003610. 

14 
R. Naz, The applications of the partial Hamiltonian approach to mechanics and other areas, International Journal of Nonlinear Mechanics, 86 (2016), 16. 

15 
R. Naz, F. M. Mahomed and A. Chaudhry, A partial Lagrangian Method for Dynamical Systems, Nonlinear Dynamics, 84 (2016), 17831794. 

16 
R. Naz, A. Chaudhry and F. M. Mahomed, Closedform solutions for the LucasUzawa model of economic growth via the partial Hamiltonian approach, Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 30 (2016), 299306. 

17 
R. Naz and A. Chaudhry, Comparison of closedform solutions for the LucasUzawa model via the partial Hamiltonian approach and the classical approach, Mathematical Modelling and Analysis, 22 (2017), 464483. 

18 
J. R. RuizTamarit, The closedform solution for a family of fourdimension nonlinear MHDS, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 32 (2008), 10001014. 

19 
H. Uzawa, Optimum technical change in an aggregative model of economic growth, International Economic Review, 6 (1965), 1831. 

20 
D. Xie, Divergence in economic performance: Transitional dynamics with multiple equilibria, Journal of Economic Theory, 63 (1994), 97112. 

Go to top
