Numerical Algebra, Control and Optimization (NACO)

An investigation of the most important factors for sustainable product development using evidential reasoning
Pages: 435 - 455, Issue 4, December 2017

doi:10.3934/naco.2017027      Abstract        References        Full text (542.2K)           Related Articles

Farzaneh Ahmadzadeh - School of Innovation, Design and Engineering, Mälardalen University, Eskilstuna, Sweden (email)
Kathrina Jederström - School of Innovation, Design and Engineering, Mälardalen University, Eskilstuna, Sweden (email)
Maria Plahn - School of Innovation, Design and Engineering, Mälardalen University, Eskilstuna, Sweden (email)
Anna Olsson - School of Innovation, Design and Engineering, Mälardalen University, Eskilstuna, Sweden (email)
Isabell Foyer - School of Innovation, Design and Engineering, Mälardalen University, Eskilstuna, Sweden (email)

1 F. Ahmadszadeh and M. Bengtsson, Using evidential reasoning approach for prioritization of maintenance-related waste caused by human factors - a case study, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 90 (2017), 2761-2775.
2 F. Ahmadszadeh and M. Bengtsson, Classification of Maintenance-related Waste Based on Human Factors, Neuchatel, Switzerland, Conference on Operations, Management for Sustainable Competitveness (22nd EurOMA), 2015.
3 P. T. Anastas and J. B. Zimmerman, Through the 12 principles of green engineering, Environ. Sci. Technol, 1 (2003), 95-101.
4 C. A. Bakker, R. Wever, C. Teoh and S. De Clerq, Designing cradle-to-cradle products: a reality check, Internat J. Sus. Eng., 3 (2010), 2-8.
5 H. Baumann, F. Boons and A Bragd, Mapping the green product development field: engineering, policy and business perspectives, J. Cleaner Prod., 10 (2002), 409-425.
6 G. Beheiry, S. M. Beheiry and M. M. Beheiry, Investigating the use of green design parameters in UAE construction projects, Internat. J. Sus. Eng., 8 (2015), 93-101.
7 M. Borchardt, M. H. Wendt, G. M. Pereira and M. A. Sellitto, Redesign of a component based on ecodesign practices: environmental impact and cost reduction achievements, J. Cleaner Prod., 19 (2011), 49-57.
8 M. Braungart and W. McDonough, Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things, Vintage, London, 2008.
9 M. Braungart, W. McDonough and A. Bollinger, Cradle-to-cradle design: creating healthy emissions: a strategy for eco-effective product and system design, J. Cleaner Prod., 15 (2007), 1337-1348.
10 S. Byggeth, G. Broman and K. H. Robert, A method for sustainable product development based on a modular, J. Cleaner Prod., 15 (2007), 1-11.
11 S. Byggeth and E. Hochschorner, Handling trade-offs in Ecodesign tools for sustainable product development and procurement, J. Cleaner Prod., 14 (2006), 1420-1430.
12 S. Case, Zeroing in on zero waste, Gov Procurement, 19 (2011), 24.
13 M. del Val Segarra-Oña, M. De-Miguel-Molina and A. Payá-Martínez, A review of the literature on Eco-design in manufacturing industry: are institutions focusing on the key aspects?}} Rev. Business Information Systems, 15 (2011), 61-67.
14 R. Docksai, A world without waste? Futurist, 48 (2014), 16-20.
15 J. Drexhage and D. Murphy, Sustainable Development: From Brundtland to Rio 2012, United Nations Headquarters, New York, 2010.
16 R. A. R. Ghazilla, N. Sakundarini, Z. Taha, S. H. Abdul-Rashid and S. Yusoff, Design for environment and design for disassembly practices in Malaysia: a practitioner's perspectives, J. Cleaner Prod., 108 (2015), 331-342.
17 K. Gowri, Desktop tools for sustainable design, ASHRAE, 47 (2005), 42-46.
18 P. L. Grogan, Zero waste: is ecotopia possible? BioCycle, 38 (1997), 86.
19 GSA U. S. General Services Administration, 2015. Available from: http://www.gsa.gov/portal/content/104462.
20 R. E. Hodgett, Comparison of multi-criteria decision-making methods for equipment selection, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 85 (2016), 1-13.
21 International Organization for Standardization, ISO 14000 family - Environmental management, Available at: https://www.iso.org/iso-14001-environmental-management.html.
22 E. Jacquet-Lagreze and J. Siskos, Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multi-criteria decision making: the UTA method, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 10 (1982), 151-164.       
23 A. Jayal, F. Badurdeen, O. Dillon Jr. and I Jawahir, Sustainable manufacturing: modeling and optimization challenges at the product, process and system levels, CIRP JMST, 2 (2010), 144-152.
24 G. Johansson, Success factors for integration of ecodesign in product development, J. Environmental Management and Health, 13 (2002), 98-107.
25 S. J. Kim, S. Kara and B. Kayis, Economic and environmental assessment of product life cycle, J. Cleaner Prod., 75 (2014), 75-85.
26 M. Kumar Mehlawat and P. Gupta, A new fuzzy group multicriteria decision making method with an application to the critical path selection, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 83 (2016), 1281-1296.
27 R. R. Lekurwale, M. M. Akarte and D. N. Raut, Framework to evaluate manufacturing capability using analytical hierarchy process, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 76 (2015), 565-576.
28 F. Lemke and J. P. P Luzio, Exploring green consumers' mind-set toward green product design and life cycle assessment, J. Ind. Ecol., 18 (2014), 619-630.
29 P. Llorach-Massana, R. Farreny and J. Oliver-Solá, Are cradle to cradle certified products environmentally preferable? Analysis from an LCA approach, J. Cleaner Prod., 93 (2015), 243-250.
30 E. Lombardi, Zero landfill is not zero waste, BioCycle, 52 (2011), 44-45.
31 E. Lombardi and J. Goldstein, Before zero waste comes producer responsibility, In Business, 23 (2001), 28-29.
32 C. Luttropp and J. Lagerstedt, Ecodesign and the ten golden rules: generic advice for merging environmental aspects into product development, J. Cleaner Prod., 14 (2006), 1396-1408.
33 W. McDonough and M. Braungart, Overview of the Cradle to Cradle Certified (CM) Product Standard - Version 3.0, Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute, 2012.
34 Q. Meng, A rapid life cycle assessment method based on green features in supporting conceptual design, Int. J. of Precis Eng. and Manuf. -Green Tech., 2 (2014), 189-196.
35 V. Paramasivam, V. Senthil and N. Rajam Ramasamy, Decision making in equipment selection: an integrated approach with digraph and matrix approach, AHP and ANP, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 54 (2011), 1233-1244.
36 S. Plouffe, P. Lanoie, C. Berneman and M. F. Vernier, Economic benefits tied to ecodesign, J. Cleaner Prod., 19 (2011), 573-579.
37 J. Pontus, L. Nordström and R. Lagerström, Formalizing analysis of enterprise architecture, in Enterprise Interoperability (eds. G. Doumeingts, J. Müller, G. Morel and B. Vallespir), Springer, London, (2007), 35-44.
38 S. Prendeville, D. F. O'Connor, and L. Palmer, Barriers and benefits to Ecodesign: a case study of tool use in an SME, IEEE ISSST, (2011), 1-6.
39 M. Rossi, S. Charon, G. Wing and J. Ewell, Design for the next generation - incorporating cradle-to-cradle design into Herman Miller products, J. Ind. Ecol., 10 (2006), 193-210.
40 G. A. Shafer, Mathematical Theory of Evidence, Princeton University Press, 1976.       
41 Y. Umeda, A. Nonomura, and T. Tomiyama, Study on life-cycle design for the post mass production paradigm, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, (2000), 149-161.
42 United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 17 sustainable development goals, 17 partnerships, 2015. Available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/211617%20Goals%2017%20Partnerships.pdf
43 United Nations, Goal 12: ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns, 2015. Available at: http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-consumption-production/
44 J. C. van Weenen, Towards sustainable product development, J. Cleaner Prod., 3 (1995), 95-100.
45 N. Vargas Hernandez, G. Okudan Kremer, L. C. Scmidt and P. R. Acosta Herrera, Development of an expert system to aid engineers in the selection of design for environment methods and tools, Expert Systems with Applications, 39 (2012), 9543-9553.
46 W. Wimmer, R. Züst and L. Kun-Mo, Ecodesign Implementation: A Systematic Guidance on Integrating Environmental Considerations into Product Development, Springer, Dordrecht, 2004.
47 World Comission on Environment and Development (WCED), Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, New York, 1987.
48 L. Xu and J. B. Yang, Introduction to multi-criteria decision making and the evidential reasoning approach, Manchester School of Management, Working Paper, 2001.
49 D. L. Xu, An introduction and survey of the evidential reasoning approach for multiple criteria decision analysis, Ann. Oper. Res., 195 (2012), 163-187.       
50 D. L. Xu,and J. B. Yang, Intelligent decision system for self-assessment, J. Multi-Criteria Decision Anal., 12 (2003), 43-60.
51 J. B. Yang and M. G. Singh, An evidential reasoning approach for multiple attribute decision making with uncertainty, IEEE Trans. Syst., Man and Cypernetics, 24 (1994), 1-18.
52 J. B. Yang, Rule and utility based evidential reasoning approach for multi-attribute decision analysis under uncertainties, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 131 (2001), 31-61.       
53 J. B. Yang and D. L. Xu, On the evidential reasoning algorithm for multi-attribute decision analysis under uncertainty, IEEE Trans. Syst., Man and Cypernetics, Part A. Systems and Humans, 32 (2002), 289-304.
54 A. U. Zaman, A comprehensive review of the development of zero waste management: lessons learned and guidelines, J. Cleaner Prod., 91 (2005), 12-25.
55 Zero Waste International Alliance, ZW definition: Zero Waste International Alliance, 2015. Available at: http://zwia.org/standards/zw-definition/
56 Z. J. Zhang, J. B. Yang and D. L. Xu, A hierarchical analysis model for multi-objective decision making, IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 22 (1989), 13-18.
57 M. Öberg, Integrated Life Cycle Design - Applied to Concrete Multi-Dwelling Buildings, Doctoral thesis, Div of Building Materials LTH, Lund University, 2005.

Go to top