Networks and Heterogeneous Media (NHM)

Opinion dynamics under the influence of radical groups, charismatic leaders, and other constant signals: A simple unifying model
Pages: 477 - 509, Issue 3, September 2015

doi:10.3934/nhm.2015.10.477      Abstract        References        Full text (2603.2K)           Related Articles

Rainer Hegselmann - Bayreuth University, Universitaetsstrasse 30, 95440 Bayreuth, Germany (email)
Ulrich Krause - Bremen University, Bibliotheksstrasse 1, 28359 Bremen, Germany (email)

1 D. Acemoglu and A. Ozdaglar, Opinion dynamics and learning in social networks, Dynamic Games and Applications, 1 (2011), 3-49.       
2 M. Baurmann, G. Betz and R. Cramm, Meinungsdynamiken in fundamentalistischen Gruppen - Erklärungshypothesen auf der Basis von Simulationsmodellen, Analyse and Kritik, 36 (2014), 61-102.
3 V. D. Blondel, J. M. Hendrickx and J. N. Tsitsiklis, Continuous-time average-preserving opinion dynamics with opinion-dependent communications, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 48 (2010), 5214-5240,       
4 B. Chazelle, The total s-energy of a multiagent system, SIAM Journal of Control and Optimization, 49 (2011), 1680-1706.       
5 G. Deffuant, F. Amblard, G. Weisbuch and T. Faure, How can extremism prevail? A study based on the relative agreement interaction model, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 5 (2002). Available from: http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/5/4/1.html.
6 G. Deffuant, D. Neau, F. Amblard and G. Weisbuch, Mixing beliefs among interacting agents, Advances in Complex Systems, 3 (2000), 87-98.
7 M. H. DeGroot, Reaching a consensus, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69 (1974), 118-121.
8 R. Hegselmann, Bounded confidence, radical groups, and charismatic leaders, in Advances in Computational Social Science and Social Simulation. Proceedings of the Social Simulation Conference 2014 Barcelona, Catalunya (Spain), September 15 (eds. F. J. Miguel, F. Amblard, J. A. Barceló and M. Madella), Autònoma University of Barcelona, (DDD repository http://ddd.uab.cat/record/125597), Barcelona, 2014, 217-219.
9 R. Hegselmann, S. König, S. Kurz, C. Niemann and J. Rambau, Optimal opinion control: The campaign problem, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation (JASSS), (2015), 47pp.
10 R. Hegselmann and U. Krause, Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: Models, analysis and simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 5 (2002). Available from: http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/5/3/2.html.
11 R. Hegselmann and U. Krause, Truth and cognitive division of labour: First steps towards a computer aided social epistemology, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 9 (2006). Available from: http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/9/3/10.html.
12 S. Huet, G. Deffuant and W. Jager, Rejection mechanism in 2d bounded confidence provides more conformity, Advances in Complex Systems, 11 (2008), 529-549.       
13 U. Krause, Positive Dynamical Systems in Discrete Time. Theory, Models, and Applications, De Gruyter, Berlin, 2015.       
14 S. Kurz and J. Rambau, On the Hegselmann-Krause conjecture in opinion dynamics, Journal of Difference Equations and Applications, 17 (2011), 859-876.       
15 J. Lorenz, Continuous opinion dynamics under bounded confidence: A survey, International Journal of Modern Physics C, 18 (2007), 1819-1838.
16 N. Oreskes and E. M. Conway, Merchants of Doubt - How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming, Bloomsbury Press, 2010.
17 G. G. Polhill, L. R. Izquierdo and N. M. Gotts, The ghost in the model (and other effects of floating point arithmetic), Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 8 (2005). Available from: http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/8/1/5.html.
18 S. Wongkaew, M. Caponigro and A. Borzí, On the control through leadership of the Hegselmann-Krause opinion formation model, Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 25 (2015), 565-585.       
19 H. Xia, H. Wang and Z. Xuan, Opinion dynamics: A multidisciplinary review and perspective on future research, International Journal of Knowledge and Systems Science, 2 (2011), 72-91.

Go to top