Conservative numerical scheme in complex arithmetic for coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations

Previous Article
Positive solutions of elliptic equations with a critical oscillatory nonlinearity
PROC Home
This Issue
Next Article
Sharp regularity of hyperbolic-dominated thermoelastic systems with point control: the clamped case

2007, 2007(Special): 982-992. doi: 10.3934/proc.2007.2007.982

Conservative numerical scheme in complex arithmetic for coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations

M. D. Todorov ^1, and C. I. Christov ^2,

1.	Department of Differential Equations, Faculty of Applied Mathematics and Informatics, Technical University of Sofia, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria
2.	Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010, United States

Received July 2006 Revised March 2007 Published September 2007

Abstract
Related Papers

For the Coupled Nonlinear Schrodinger Equations (CNLSE) we construct a conservative fully implicit numerical scheme using complex arithmetic which allows to reduce the computational time fourfold. We obtain various results numerically and investigate the role of the nonlinear and linear coupling. For nontrivial but moderate nonlinear coupling parameter, we find that the polarization of the system changes, but no other effects are present. For large values of the nonlinear coupling parameter, additional (faster) solitons are created during the collision of the initial ones. The linear coupling is shown to manage the self-focusing/dispersion and to make the additional solitons appear for smaller nonlinear coupling. These seem to be new effects, not reported in the literature.

Keywords: NLS-like (nonlinear Schrodinger) equations, Solitons., Conservative numerical schemes, Finite difference methods.

Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 65M06, 35Q55 Secondary: 35Q5.

Citation: M. D. Todorov, C. I. Christov. Conservative numerical scheme in complex arithmetic for coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations. Conference Publications, 2007, 2007 (Special) : 982-992. doi: 10.3934/proc.2007.2007.982

[1]	Alexandre N. Carvalho, Jan W. Cholewa. NLS-like equations in bounded domains: Parabolic approximation procedure. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2018, 23 (1) : 57-77. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018005
[2]	Claire david@lmm.jussieu.fr David, Pierre Sagaut. Theoretical optimization of finite difference schemes. Conference Publications, 2007, 2007 (Special) : 286-293. doi: 10.3934/proc.2007.2007.286
[3]	Xiaohai Wan, Zhilin Li. Some new finite difference methods for Helmholtz equations on irregular domains or with interfaces. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2012, 17 (4) : 1155-1174. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2012.17.1155
[4]	Z. Jackiewicz, B. Zubik-Kowal, B. Basse. Finite-difference and pseudo-spectral methods for the numerical simulations of in vitro human tumor cell population kinetics. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2009, 6 (3) : 561-572. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2009.6.561
[5]	Emma Hoarau, Claire david@lmm.jussieu.fr David, Pierre Sagaut, Thiên-Hiêp Lê. Lie group study of finite difference schemes. Conference Publications, 2007, 2007 (Special) : 495-505. doi: 10.3934/proc.2007.2007.495
[6]	Ya-Xiang Yuan. Recent advances in numerical methods for nonlinear equations and nonlinear least squares. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2011, 1 (1) : 15-34. doi: 10.3934/naco.2011.1.15
[7]	Shalva Amiranashvili, Raimondas Čiegis, Mindaugas Radziunas. Numerical methods for a class of generalized nonlinear Schrödinger equations. Kinetic & Related Models, 2015, 8 (2) : 215-234. doi: 10.3934/krm.2015.8.215
[8]	Roumen Anguelov, Jean M.-S. Lubuma, Meir Shillor. Dynamically consistent nonstandard finite difference schemes for continuous dynamical systems. Conference Publications, 2009, 2009 (Special) : 34-43. doi: 10.3934/proc.2009.2009.34
[9]	Walid K. Abou Salem, Xiao Liu, Catherine Sulem. Numerical simulation of resonant tunneling of fast solitons for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2011, 29 (4) : 1637-1649. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.29.1637
[10]	Adam M. Oberman. Wide stencil finite difference schemes for the elliptic Monge-Ampère equation and functions of the eigenvalues of the Hessian. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2008, 10 (1) : 221-238. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2008.10.221
[11]	Bernard Ducomet, Alexander Zlotnik, Ilya Zlotnik. On a family of finite-difference schemes with approximate transparent boundary conditions for a generalized 1D Schrödinger equation. Kinetic & Related Models, 2009, 2 (1) : 151-179. doi: 10.3934/krm.2009.2.151
[12]	Lih-Ing W. Roeger. Dynamically consistent discrete Lotka-Volterra competition models derived from nonstandard finite-difference schemes. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2008, 9 (2) : 415-429. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2008.9.415
[13]	Joseph A. Connolly, Neville J. Ford. Comparison of numerical methods for fractional differential equations. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2006, 5 (2) : 289-307. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2006.5.289
[14]	Nikolaos Halidias. Construction of positivity preserving numerical schemes for some multidimensional stochastic differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2015, 20 (1) : 153-160. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2015.20.153
[15]	Takahiro Hashimoto. Nonexistence of global solutions of nonlinear Schrodinger equations in non star-shaped domains. Conference Publications, 2007, 2007 (Special) : 487-494. doi: 10.3934/proc.2007.2007.487
[16]	Marx Chhay, Aziz Hamdouni. On the accuracy of invariant numerical schemes. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2011, 10 (2) : 761-783. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2011.10.761
[17]	Takeshi Fukao, Shuji Yoshikawa, Saori Wada. Structure-preserving finite difference schemes for the Cahn-Hilliard equation with dynamic boundary conditions in the one-dimensional case. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2017, 16 (5) : 1915-1938. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2017093
[18]	Alexandra Rodkina, Henri Schurz. On positivity and boundedness of solutions of nonlinear stochastic difference equations. Conference Publications, 2009, 2009 (Special) : 640-649. doi: 10.3934/proc.2009.2009.640
[19]	Jonathan Touboul. Controllability of the heat and wave equations and their finite difference approximations by the shape of the domain. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2012, 2 (4) : 429-455. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2012.2.429
[20]	Iasson Karafyllis, Lars Grüne. Feedback stabilization methods for the numerical solution of ordinary differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2011, 16 (1) : 283-317. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2011.16.283

Impact Factor:

American Institute of Mathematical Sciences