# American Institue of Mathematical Sciences

2015, 12(4): 841-858. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2015.12.841

## Quantitative impact of immunomodulation versus oncolysis with cytokine-expressing virus therapeutics

 1 School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia 2 Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States 3 Department of Bioengineering, College of Engineering, Hanyang University, 222 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 133-791, South Korea 4 Department of Bioengineering, College of Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea 5 Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Richmond, Richmond, VA, United States

Received  May 2014 Revised  October 2014 Published  April 2015

The past century's description of oncolytic virotherapy as a cancer treatment involving specially-engineered viruses that exploit immune deficiencies to selectively lyse cancer cells is no longer adequate. Some of the most promising therapeutic candidates are now being engineered to produce immunostimulatory factors, such as cytokines and co-stimulatory molecules, which, in addition to viral oncolysis, initiate a cytotoxic immune attack against the tumor.
This study addresses the combined effects of viral oncolysis and T-cell-mediated oncolysis. We employ a mathematical model of virotherapy that induces release of cytokine IL-12 and co-stimulatory molecule 4-1BB ligand. We found that the model closely matches previously published data, and while viral oncolysis is fundamental in reducing tumor burden, increased stimulation of cytotoxic T cells leads to a short-term reduction in tumor size, but a faster relapse.
In addition, we found that combinations of specialist viruses that express either IL-12 or 4-1BBL might initially act more potently against tumors than a generalist virus that simultaneously expresses both, but the advantage is likely not large enough to replace treatment using the generalist virus. Finally, according to our model and its current assumptions, virotherapy appears to be optimizable through targeted design and treatment combinations to substantially improve therapeutic outcomes.
Citation: Peter S. Kim, Joseph J. Crivelli, Il-Kyu Choi, Chae-Ok Yun, Joanna R. Wares. Quantitative impact of immunomodulation versus oncolysis with cytokine-expressing virus therapeutics. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2015, 12 (4) : 841-858. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2015.12.841
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
 [1] Zizi Wang, Zhiming Guo, Huaqin Peng. Dynamical behavior of a new oncolytic virotherapy model based on gene variation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2017, 10 (5) : 1079-1093. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2017058 [2] Ratajczyk Elzbieta, Ledzewicz Urszula, Leszczynski Maciej, Friedman Avner. The role of TNF-$\alpha$ inhibitor in glioma virotherapy: A mathematical model. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2017, 14 (1) : 305-319. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2017020 [3] Zindoga Mukandavire, Abba B. Gumel, Winston Garira, Jean Michel Tchuenche. Mathematical analysis of a model for HIV-malaria co-infection. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2009, 6 (2) : 333-362. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2009.6.333 [4] Daniel Vasiliu, Jianjun Paul Tian. Periodic solutions of a model for tumor virotherapy. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2011, 4 (6) : 1587-1597. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2011.4.1587 [5] Jianjun Paul Tian. The replicability of oncolytic virus: Defining conditions in tumor virotherapy. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2011, 8 (3) : 841-860. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2011.8.841 [6] Marcello Delitala, Tommaso Lorenzi. Emergence of spatial patterns in a mathematical model for the co-culture dynamics of epithelial-like and mesenchymal-like cells. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2017, 14 (1) : 79-93. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2017006 [7] Ghendrih Philippe, Hauray Maxime, Anne Nouri. Derivation of a gyrokinetic model. Existence and uniqueness of specific stationary solution. Kinetic & Related Models, 2009, 2 (4) : 707-725. doi: 10.3934/krm.2009.2.707 [8] Sebastián Ferrer, Francisco Crespo. Parametric quartic Hamiltonian model. A unified treatment of classic integrable systems. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2014, 6 (4) : 479-502. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2014.6.479 [9] Bernard Dacorogna, Alessandro Ferriero. Regularity and selecting principles for implicit ordinary differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2009, 11 (1) : 87-101. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2009.11.87 [10] Zvi Artstein. Averaging of ordinary differential equations with slowly varying averages. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2010, 14 (2) : 353-365. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.14.353 [11] Faker Ben Belgacem. Uniqueness for an ill-posed reaction-dispersion model. Application to organic pollution in stream-waters. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2012, 6 (2) : 163-181. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2012.6.163 [12] W. Sarlet, G. E. Prince, M. Crampin. Generalized submersiveness of second-order ordinary differential equations. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2009, 1 (2) : 209-221. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2009.1.209 [13] Hongwei Lou, Weihan Wang. Optimal blowup/quenching time for controlled autonomous ordinary differential equations. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2015, 5 (3) : 517-527. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2015.5.517 [14] Jean Mawhin, James R. Ward Jr. Guiding-like functions for periodic or bounded solutions of ordinary differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2002, 8 (1) : 39-54. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2002.8.39 [15] Iasson Karafyllis, Lars Grüne. Feedback stabilization methods for the numerical solution of ordinary differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2011, 16 (1) : 283-317. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2011.16.283 [16] Alessandro Fonda, Fabio Zanolin. Bounded solutions of nonlinear second order ordinary differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 1998, 4 (1) : 91-98. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1998.4.91 [17] Bin Wang, Arieh Iserles. Dirichlet series for dynamical systems of first-order ordinary differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2014, 19 (1) : 281-298. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2014.19.281 [18] Aeeman Fatima, F. M. Mahomed, Chaudry Masood Khalique. Conditional symmetries of nonlinear third-order ordinary differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2018, 11 (4) : 655-666. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2018040 [19] Roderick Melnik, B. Lassen, L. C Lew Yan Voon, M. Willatzen, C. Galeriu. Accounting for nonlinearities in mathematical modelling of quantum dot molecules. Conference Publications, 2005, 2005 (Special) : 642-651. doi: 10.3934/proc.2005.2005.642 [20] Baba Issa Camara, Houda Mokrani, Evans K. Afenya. Mathematical modeling of glioma therapy using oncolytic viruses. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2013, 10 (3) : 565-578. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.565

2016 Impact Factor: 1.035