2009, 6(3): 591-602. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2009.6.591

The relative biologic effectiveness versus linear energy transfer curve as an output-input relation for linear cellular systems

1. 

Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States

2. 

Department of Mathematics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, United States

Received  September 2008 Revised  December 2008 Published  June 2009

Experiments have established that different radiation types have different magnitudes of biological response. When biological response is defined in terms of the Relative Biologic Effectiveness (RBE) and different radiation type is characterized by Linear Energy Transfer (LET), the plot of the RBE versus LET (RBE-LET) curve shows RBE to increase with increasing LET, to reach a maximum, and to decrease with further increasing LET. Perhaps due to the descriptive nature of biology, most quantitative models for the RBE-LET curve ignore the reality of the underlying molecular biology. On the other hand, the molecular basis for the RBE-LET curve is not completely known despite recent efforts.
   Here we introduce a differential equation formulation for a signal-and-system model that sees cells as systems, different radiation types as input, and cellular responses as output. Because of scant knowledge of the underlying biochemical network, the current version is necessarily a work in progress. It explains the RBE-LET curve using not just input parameters but also systems internal state parameters. These systems internal state parameters represent parts of a biochemical network within a cell. Although multiple biochemical parts may well be involved, the shape of the RBE-LET curve is reproduced when only three system parameters are related to three biochemical parts: the molecular machinery for DNA double strand break repair; the molecular pathways for handling oxidative stress; and the radiolytic products of the cellular water.
   Despite being a simplified ''toy model,'' changes in the systems state parameters lead to model curves that are refutable in a modern molecular biology laboratory. As the parts in the biochemical network of the radiation response are being further elucidated, this model can incorporate new systems state parameters to allow a more accurate fit.
Citation: Quoc T. Luu, Paul DuChateau. The relative biologic effectiveness versus linear energy transfer curve as an output-input relation for linear cellular systems. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2009, 6 (3) : 591-602. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2009.6.591
[1]

Howard A. Levine, Yeon-Jung Seo, Marit Nilsen-Hamilton. A discrete dynamical system arising in molecular biology. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2012, 17 (6) : 2091-2151. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2012.17.2091

[2]

Eugene Kashdan, Dominique Duncan, Andrew Parnell, Heinz Schättler. Mathematical methods in systems biology. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2016, 13 (6) : i-ii. doi: 10.3934/mbe.201606i

[3]

N. Bellomo, A. Bellouquid. From a class of kinetic models to the macroscopic equations for multicellular systems in biology. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2004, 4 (1) : 59-80. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2004.4.59

[4]

Judith R. Miller, Huihui Zeng. Stability of traveling waves for systems of nonlinear integral recursions in spatial population biology. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2011, 16 (3) : 895-925. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2011.16.895

[5]

Avner Friedman. Conservation laws in mathematical biology. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2012, 32 (9) : 3081-3097. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2012.32.3081

[6]

Avner Friedman. PDE problems arising in mathematical biology. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2012, 7 (4) : 691-703. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2012.7.691

[7]

Jacky Cresson, Bénédicte Puig, Stefanie Sonner. Stochastic models in biology and the invariance problem. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (7) : 2145-2168. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016041

[8]

Avner Friedman. Free boundary problems arising in biology. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2018, 23 (1) : 193-202. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018013

[9]

Heiko Enderling, Alexander R.A. Anderson, Mark A.J. Chaplain, Glenn W.A. Rowe. Visualisation of the numerical solution of partial differential equation systems in three space dimensions and its importance for mathematical models in biology. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2006, 3 (4) : 571-582. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2006.3.571

[10]

F. R. Guarguaglini, R. Natalini. Global existence and uniqueness of solutions for multidimensional weakly parabolic systems arising in chemistry and biology. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2007, 6 (1) : 287-309. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2007.6.287

[11]

Charles Wiseman, M.D.. Questions from the fourth son: A clinician reflects on immunomonitoring, surrogate markers and systems biology. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2011, 8 (2) : 279-287. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2011.8.279

[12]

Qingdao Huang, Hong Qian. The dynamics of zeroth-order ultrasensitivity: A critical phenomenon in cell biology. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2011, 4 (6) : 1457-1464. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2011.4.1457

[13]

Erika T. Camacho, Christopher M. Kribs-Zaleta, Stephen Wirkus. The mathematical and theoretical biology institute - a model of mentorship through research. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2013, 10 (5&6) : 1351-1363. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.1351

[14]

Edward J. Allen. Derivation and computation of discrete-delay and continuous-delay SDEs in mathematical biology. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2014, 11 (3) : 403-425. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2014.11.403

[15]

Hinke M. Osinga, Arthur Sherman, Krasimira Tsaneva-Atanasova. Cross-currents between biology and mathematics: The codimension of pseudo-plateau bursting. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2012, 32 (8) : 2853-2877. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2012.32.2853

[16]

John D. Nagy. The Ecology and Evolutionary Biology of Cancer: A Review of Mathematical Models of Necrosis and Tumor Cell Diversity. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2005, 2 (2) : 381-418. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2005.2.381

[17]

Tuoi Vo, William Lee, Adam Peddle, Martin Meere. Modelling chemistry and biology after implantation of a drug-eluting stent. Part Ⅰ: Drug transport. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2017, 14 (2) : 491-509. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2017030

[18]

Adam Peddle, William Lee, Tuoi Vo. Modelling chemistry and biology after implantation of a drug-eluting stent. Part Ⅱ: Cell proliferation. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2018, 15 (5) : 1117-1135. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2018050

[19]

Koray Karabina, Berkant Ustaoglu. Invalid-curve attacks on (hyper)elliptic curve cryptosystems. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2010, 4 (3) : 307-321. doi: 10.3934/amc.2010.4.307

[20]

Robert L. Devaney, Daniel M. Look. Buried Sierpinski curve Julia sets. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2005, 13 (4) : 1035-1046. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2005.13.1035

2017 Impact Factor: 1.23

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (1)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (0)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]