2008, 2(2): 187-208. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2008.2.187

Partial hyperbolicity and ergodicity in dimension three

1. 

IMERL-Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de la República, ulio Herrera y Reissig 565, CC 30, 11300 Montevideo, Uruguay

2. 

IMERL-Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de la República, CC 30 Montevideo, Uruguay, Uruguay

Received  March 2007 Revised  November 2007 Published  January 2008

In [15] the authors proved the Pugh–Shub conjecture for partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms with 1-dimensional center, i.e., stably ergodic diffeomorphisms are dense among the partially hyperbolic ones. In this work we address the issue of giving a more accurate description of this abundance of ergodicity. In particular, we give the first examples of manifolds in which all conservative partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms are ergodic.
Citation: Federico Rodriguez Hertz, María Alejandra Rodriguez Hertz, Raúl Ures. Partial hyperbolicity and ergodicity in dimension three. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2008, 2 (2) : 187-208. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2008.2.187
[1]

Sergey Kryzhevich, Sergey Tikhomirov. Partial hyperbolicity and central shadowing. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2013, 33 (7) : 2901-2909. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.2901

[2]

Yakov Pesin. On the work of Dolgopyat on partial and nonuniform hyperbolicity. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2010, 4 (2) : 227-241. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2010.4.227

[3]

Jérôme Buzzi, Todd Fisher. Entropic stability beyond partial hyperbolicity. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2013, 7 (4) : 527-552. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2013.7.527

[4]

Andy Hammerlindl. Partial hyperbolicity on 3-dimensional nilmanifolds. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2013, 33 (8) : 3641-3669. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.3641

[5]

Eleonora Catsigeras, Xueting Tian. Dominated splitting, partial hyperbolicity and positive entropy. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2016, 36 (9) : 4739-4759. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2016006

[6]

Rafael Potrie. Partial hyperbolicity and foliations in $\mathbb{T}^3$. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2015, 9: 81-121. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2015.9.81

[7]

Marcin Mazur, Jacek Tabor, Piotr Kościelniak. Semi-hyperbolicity and hyperbolicity. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2008, 20 (4) : 1029-1038. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2008.20.1029

[8]

Alexander Blokh, Lex Oversteegen, Ross Ptacek, Vladlen Timorin. Laminations from the main cubioid. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2016, 36 (9) : 4665-4702. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2016003

[9]

Marcin Mazur, Jacek Tabor. Computational hyperbolicity. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2011, 29 (3) : 1175-1189. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.29.1175

[10]

Boris Hasselblatt, Yakov Pesin, Jörg Schmeling. Pointwise hyperbolicity implies uniform hyperbolicity. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2014, 34 (7) : 2819-2827. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.2819

[11]

Charles Pugh, Michael Shub, Alexander Starkov. Unique ergodicity, stable ergodicity, and the Mautner phenomenon for diffeomorphisms. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2006, 14 (4) : 845-855. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.14.845

[12]

Keith Burns, Federico Rodriguez Hertz, María Alejandra Rodriguez Hertz, Anna Talitskaya, Raúl Ures. Density of accessibility for partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms with one-dimensional center. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2008, 22 (1&2) : 75-88. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2008.22.75

[13]

Martino Bardi, Yoshikazu Giga. Right accessibility of semicontinuous initial data for Hamilton-Jacobi equations. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2003, 2 (4) : 447-459. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2003.2.447

[14]

Zbigniew Bartosiewicz, Ülle Kotta, Maris Tőnso, Małgorzata Wyrwas. Accessibility conditions of MIMO nonlinear control systems on homogeneous time scales. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2016, 6 (2) : 217-250. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2016002

[15]

Gabriel Rivière. Remarks on quantum ergodicity. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2013, 7 (1) : 119-133. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2013.7.119

[16]

Jon Chaika, Rodrigo Treviño. Logarithmic laws and unique ergodicity. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2017, 11: 563-588. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2017022

[17]

Alexander Blokh, Clinton Curry, Lex Oversteegen. Density of orbits in laminations and the space of critical portraits. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2012, 32 (6) : 2027-2039. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2012.32.2027

[18]

Alexander Blokh. Necessary conditions for the existence of wandering triangles for cubic laminations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2005, 13 (1) : 13-34. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2005.13.13

[19]

Meiyu Su. True laminations for complex Hènon maps. Conference Publications, 2003, 2003 (Special) : 834-841. doi: 10.3934/proc.2003.2003.834

[20]

Luis Barreira, Claudia Valls. Growth rates and nonuniform hyperbolicity. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2008, 22 (3) : 509-528. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2008.22.509

2016 Impact Factor: 0.706

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (0)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (12)

[Back to Top]