# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

April  2016, 9(2): 537-556. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2016011

## Analysis of an iterative scheme of fractional steps type associated to the nonlinear phase-field equation with non-homogeneous dynamic boundary conditions

 1 Université de Poitiers, Laboratoire de Mathématiques et Applications, UMR CNRS 7348 - SP2MI, Boulevard Marie et Pierre Curie - Téléport 2, 86962 Chasseneuil Futuroscope Cedex 2 University "Al. I. Cuza" of Iasi, 700506 Iaşi, Romania

Received  August 2014 Revised  November 2014 Published  March 2016

The paper concerns with the existence, uniqueness, regularity and the approximation of solutions to the nonlinear phase-field (Allen-Cahn) equation, endowed with non-homogeneous dynamic boundary conditions (depending both on time and space variables). It extends the already studied types of boundary conditions, which makes the problem to be more able to describe many important phenomena of two-phase systems, in particular, the interactions with the walls in confined systems. The convergence and error estimate results for an iterative scheme of fractional steps type, associated to the nonlinear parabolic equation, are also established. The advantage of such method consists in simplifying the numerical computation. On the basis of this approach, a conceptual numerical algorithm is formulated in the end.
Citation: Alain Miranville, Costică Moroşanu. Analysis of an iterative scheme of fractional steps type associated to the nonlinear phase-field equation with non-homogeneous dynamic boundary conditions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2016, 9 (2) : 537-556. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2016011
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
 [1] Alexandre Nolasco de Carvalho, Marcos Roberto Teixeira Primo. Spatial homogeneity in parabolic problems with nonlinear boundary conditions. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2004, 3 (4) : 637-651. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2004.3.637 [2] Davide Guidetti. Classical solutions to quasilinear parabolic problems with dynamic boundary conditions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2016, 9 (3) : 717-736. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2016024 [3] Ángela Jiménez-Casas, Aníbal Rodríguez-Bernal. Dynamic boundary conditions as limit of singularly perturbed parabolic problems. Conference Publications, 2011, 2011 (Special) : 737-746. doi: 10.3934/proc.2011.2011.737 [4] Mark I. Vishik, Sergey Zelik. Attractors for the nonlinear elliptic boundary value problems and their parabolic singular limit. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2014, 13 (5) : 2059-2093. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2014.13.2059 [5] Lahcen Maniar, Martin Meyries, Roland Schnaubelt. Null controllability for parabolic equations with dynamic boundary conditions. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2017, 6 (3) : 381-407. doi: 10.3934/eect.2017020 [6] R.G. Duran, J.I. Etcheverry, J.D. Rossi. Numerical approximation of a parabolic problem with a nonlinear boundary condition. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 1998, 4 (3) : 497-506. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1998.4.497 [7] Xiao-Yu Zhang, Qing Fang. A sixth order numerical method for a class of nonlinear two-point boundary value problems. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2012, 2 (1) : 31-43. doi: 10.3934/naco.2012.2.31 [8] Laurence Cherfils, Madalina Petcu, Morgan Pierre. A numerical analysis of the Cahn-Hilliard equation with dynamic boundary conditions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2010, 27 (4) : 1511-1533. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.27.1511 [9] Felix Sadyrbaev. Nonlinear boundary value problems of the calculus of variations. Conference Publications, 2003, 2003 (Special) : 760-770. doi: 10.3934/proc.2003.2003.760 [10] Feliz Minhós, Rui Carapinha. On higher order nonlinear impulsive boundary value problems. Conference Publications, 2015, 2015 (special) : 851-860. doi: 10.3934/proc.2015.0851 [11] John V. Baxley, Philip T. Carroll. Nonlinear boundary value problems with multiple positive solutions. Conference Publications, 2003, 2003 (Special) : 83-90. doi: 10.3934/proc.2003.2003.83 [12] Ciprian G. Gal, Mahamadi Warma. Elliptic and parabolic equations with fractional diffusion and dynamic boundary conditions. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2016, 5 (1) : 61-103. doi: 10.3934/eect.2016.5.61 [13] Raluca Clendenen, Gisèle Ruiz Goldstein, Jerome A. Goldstein. Degenerate flux for dynamic boundary conditions in parabolic and hyperbolic equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2016, 9 (3) : 651-660. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2016019 [14] Davide Guidetti. Parabolic problems with general Wentzell boundary conditions and diffusion on the boundary. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2016, 15 (4) : 1401-1417. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2016.15.1401 [15] Nicolas Fourrier, Irena Lasiecka. Regularity and stability of a wave equation with a strong damping and dynamic boundary conditions. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2013, 2 (4) : 631-667. doi: 10.3934/eect.2013.2.631 [16] Roland Schnaubelt. Center manifolds and attractivity for quasilinear parabolic problems with fully nonlinear dynamical boundary conditions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2015, 35 (3) : 1193-1230. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.1193 [17] Joachim von Below, Gaëlle Pincet Mailly. Blow up for some nonlinear parabolic problems with convection under dynamical boundary conditions. Conference Publications, 2007, 2007 (Special) : 1031-1041. doi: 10.3934/proc.2007.2007.1031 [18] Gabriele Bonanno, Giuseppina D'Aguì. Mixed elliptic problems involving the $p-$Laplacian with nonhomogeneous boundary conditions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2017, 37 (11) : 5797-5817. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017252 [19] Hiroshi Watanabe. Solvability of boundary value problems for strongly degenerate parabolic equations with discontinuous coefficients. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2014, 7 (1) : 177-189. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2014.7.177 [20] G. Métivier, K. Zumbrun. Symmetrizers and continuity of stable subspaces for parabolic-hyperbolic boundary value problems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2004, 11 (1) : 205-220. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2004.11.205

2018 Impact Factor: 0.545